2018
DOI: 10.1101/474296
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BEAST 2.5: An Advanced Software Platform for Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis

Abstract: Elaboration of Bayesian phylogenetic inference methods has continued at pace in recent years with major new advances in nearly all aspects of the joint modelling of evolutionary data. It is increasingly appreciated that some evolutionary questions can only be adequately answered by combining evidence from multiple independent sources of data, including genome sequences, sampling dates, phenotypic data, radiocarbon dates, fossil occurrences, and biogeographic range information among others. Including all releva… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also what we observed on the ancestry recombination graph reconstructed using sequences of the 85 European STs and generated in beast2 (Bouckaert et al, ; Figure ). This method was used because we suspected recombination between housekeeping loci.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also what we observed on the ancestry recombination graph reconstructed using sequences of the 85 European STs and generated in beast2 (Bouckaert et al, ; Figure ). This method was used because we suspected recombination between housekeeping loci.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An ancestry recombination graph for the 85 STs present in Europe was reconstructed with beast2 software v. 2.5 (Bouckaert et al, ) and package bacter v. 2.2 (Didelot, Lawson, Darling, & Falush, ; Vaughan et al, ) using sequences of the eight housekeeping genes. beast2 was run three times with a unique tree and substitution model for the eight loci but with a lognormal‐relaxed clock model for each locus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize noise and shorten analysis time for species tree inference, a maximum likelihood (ML) consensus tree was first inferred using IQ‐TREE 1.6.10 (Nguyen, Schmidt, von Haeseler, & Minh, ) on a dataset from which the uninformative loci BDNF, PLCB4, RAG‐1 and RAG‐2 were removed. A species tree was then estimated with BEAST 2.5.2 (Bouckaert et al, ) using a log‐normal relaxed clock birth–death model and the consensus ML tree as a starting guide tree. A Yule prior was not a better fit to our data, thus we chose the birth model, which is better suited as a null hypothesis for species diversification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markov chain performance for species trees was verified using Tracer to ensure ESS values above 200, appropriate burn‐in and chain convergence. This required using LogCombiner 2.5.2 (Bouckaert et al, ) to combine multiple BEAST runs with the same parameters with 20% burn‐in; the final sample of trees was run for 200 million generations. There were 14,401 trees in the final posterior distribution from BEAST .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divergence time estimates were performed by Bayesian analyses using full mitochondrial genomes only, with the software BEAST 2.3.2 (Bouckaert et al, ). The alignment was partitioned as specified above for the Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%