Bearing Capacity of Structures Made of Materials with Different Tensile and Compression Strengths

Soroka, Mykola

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.968.200

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1. The direct method of calculating the limit equilibrium [4,9] makes it easy to develop an algorithm for the numerical calculation of bar systems of variable stiffness and implement it in the form of program code. 2.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the numerical determination of the ultimate load, the direct method is used, which was used in [4] to calculate rod systems without taking into account the longitudinal force. A similar method was used by the author in [8,9] to calculate the ultimate load while taking into account the longitudinal force and bending moment for bar systems with elements of constant stiffness. In this paper, the algorithm [9] is slightly modified and adapted to calculate systems with elements of variable stiffness.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A similar method was used by the author in [8,9] to calculate the ultimate load while taking into account the longitudinal force and bending moment for bar systems with elements of constant stiffness. In this paper, the algorithm [9] is slightly modified and adapted to calculate systems with elements of variable stiffness. The analytical determination of the ultimate load for the arch is based on the solution of the linear programming problem [3] with the use of yield conditions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering the limiting state of a rectangular section, the height of which depends on its coordinate а, we use results, obtained in [9] for rectangle section with constant height. With the simultaneous action of a longitudinal force and a bending moment, the section strength region is described by the dependences:…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Limit State of Arches of Variable Stiffness

Soroka¹

2020

BOSACEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. An algorithm is proposed for numerically solving the problem of finding the maximum load for flat bar systems having a rectangular section of variable height. The material is elastoplastic; its physical properties are described by the Prandtl diagram. It is assumed that the compressive and tensile strength of the material are different. The modulus of elasticity in tension and compression is the same. The limiting state of a rectangular cross section under the simultaneous action of a longitudinal force and a bending moment is described. Using the proposed algorithm, a program was developed for calculating rod systems by the limit equilibrium. The C++ programming language was used to create a program for the numerical determination of the ultimate load for rod systems. The finite element method was used as the most universal to write a module that performs static analysis of the bar system. Its use makes it easy to design rod systems of arbitrary configuration with arbitrary boundary conditions. As a test example, a hinged circular arch loaded with a uniformly distributed vertical load is considered. Analytical dependences are written, which allow to obtain the ultimate load for an arch of variable section. Examples of calculating the limiting state of the arch and comparing the ultimate loads with and without longitudinal force are considered. The analytical solution is compared with the numerical solution found by the author's program. Good convergence of analytical and numerical solutions is shown. The proposed algorithm for the numerical calculation of the limit states uses the so-called direct method for finding the ultimate load. This allows not only to obtain the value of the ultimate load, but also to establish the order of formation of plastic regions in the sections of the rod system. The calculation algorithm does not imply the use of iterative processes, which has a positive effect on the speed of calculations. Within the accepted assumptions, the calculation methodology is accurate.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations