2019
DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2019.1617480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bearing capacity and failure mechanism of shallow footings on unreinforced slopes: a state-of-the-art review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in the crest distance relates to the support available to the surface footing on the slope side, as discussed above. An increase in the crest distance reduces the asymmetric nature of the failure mechanism, allowing more support to the slope side of the footing and causing a decrease in the footing settlement (Dey et al 2019). The trends illustrated in Figure 8 comprehensively prove that the developed MLP model network correctly predicts the underlying physical behavior of the investigated system according to the known knowledge pertaining to geotechnical engineering, and thus can be considered reliable and robust.…”
Section: Model Robustness and Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in the crest distance relates to the support available to the surface footing on the slope side, as discussed above. An increase in the crest distance reduces the asymmetric nature of the failure mechanism, allowing more support to the slope side of the footing and causing a decrease in the footing settlement (Dey et al 2019). The trends illustrated in Figure 8 comprehensively prove that the developed MLP model network correctly predicts the underlying physical behavior of the investigated system according to the known knowledge pertaining to geotechnical engineering, and thus can be considered reliable and robust.…”
Section: Model Robustness and Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…An increase in the slope angle ratio increases the slope instability and hence reduces the support available to the footing on the slope side, explained in terms of the asymmetric footing failure mechanism (Hovan 1985;Graham et al 1988). Due to the increase in asymmetric footing failure with an increase in slope angle ratio, the soil along the unstable slope yields under load application, resulting in increased footing settlement (Keskin and Laman 2013;Dey et al 2019). The hoop and bending stiffness of the conduit are the design parameters that are employed to classify a conduit as either rigid or flexible (Mcgrath 1999).…”
Section: Model Robustness and Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the prior research rather regarded analytical methods, the current analytical trends are FEM-directed. The computations involve various methods, material models, and detailed solutions adjusted to specific tasks, see (Dey et al 2019) and their references. Aldosary et al (Aldosary et al Abstract This work conducts a probabilistic inquiry on how the variability of the parameter defining soil deformability affects the settlement of the foundation located on the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Po Shan landslides in 1972 has killed 138 people and lead to the damage of the several civil infrastructures on the slope (Choi et al [5]). There are several studies undertaken during the last 50 years to understand the behavior of foundations-slope systems (Meyerhof [6], Shields et al [7], Raj et al [8], Dey et al [9], Li et al [10]). These studies provide valuable information for understanding the foundation-slope behavior taking account influence of various parameters such as the slope geometry and foundation positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%