2009
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.49.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bearing Capacity and Failure Mechanism of Different Types of Foundations on Sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be due to the fact that the shell footings extend the failure zone into the depth of foundation, tending to provision of more resisting force against failure. This is in agreement with experimental studies of other researchers [3,9,32].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be due to the fact that the shell footings extend the failure zone into the depth of foundation, tending to provision of more resisting force against failure. This is in agreement with experimental studies of other researchers [3,9,32].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Shells are thinwalled structures which obtain the stability and bearing capacity from their specified shape. This characteristic enables them to create maximum structural efficiency with minimum materials [1][2][3][4]. From geotechnical point of view, the specific performance of shell footings has been directly related to different shapes including conical, pyramidal and triangular shell strip footings [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the apex angle, the bearing capacity of shell foundations in flat ground conditions is in the range of 8%−18% more than the simple foundation. This can be attributed to the fact that the shell footings extend the failure zone into the depth of the foundation to provide more resisting forces against failure, which is in agreement with previous experimental studies [8,14,33].…”
Section: Bearing Capacity In Unreinforced Slope Conditionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Numerical limit analysis for both surface and embedded foundations demonstrated reasonable agreement with model testing. When the interface condition at the base and side of the foundation was progressively shifted from smooth to rough, the findings revealed that the bearing capacity of T-bar, shell block, and rigid block foundations increased [9].…”
Section: Experimental Overview Researchesmentioning
confidence: 99%