2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-008-0128-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BearCam: automated wildlife monitoring at the arctic circle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies on 3D location determination using a nonmetric camera, Rieke-Zapp and Nearing [40] and D'Amelio and Brutto [41] reported that RMS errors within 0.2 pixels appeared in the calibration of high-resolution cameras. Other studies have reported a range of RMS errors within a half 516 S. Lee et al Holman and Stanley [10] Wawerla et al [34] Newbery and Southwell [12] Bater et al [14,35] Monitoring system System name Holman and Stanley [10] Wawerla et al [34] Newbery and Southwell [12] Bater et al [14,35] Image capture pixel. [43,44] Chandler et al [45] observed that RMS errors within 0.3$0.4 pixel appeared in the calibration of a low-priced camera.…”
Section: Camera Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies on 3D location determination using a nonmetric camera, Rieke-Zapp and Nearing [40] and D'Amelio and Brutto [41] reported that RMS errors within 0.2 pixels appeared in the calibration of high-resolution cameras. Other studies have reported a range of RMS errors within a half 516 S. Lee et al Holman and Stanley [10] Wawerla et al [34] Newbery and Southwell [12] Bater et al [14,35] Monitoring system System name Holman and Stanley [10] Wawerla et al [34] Newbery and Southwell [12] Bater et al [14,35] Image capture pixel. [43,44] Chandler et al [45] observed that RMS errors within 0.3$0.4 pixel appeared in the calibration of a low-priced camera.…”
Section: Camera Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this section, the proposed system is compared to several previously proposed systems, hereafter referred to as case A, [10] case B, [34] case C, [12] and case D, [14,35] and then evaluated.…”
Section: Smartphone-based Environmental Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face detection has also been used to classify species of African great apes using footage taken from video traps [35]. In settings most similar to this work, BearCam has been used to detect bears in the arctic circle during four hour daytime periods [36] by taking low level features such as image gradients and background differences and combining them into a mid-level motion shapelet [37] using AdaBoost [38].…”
Section: A Detecting Animals In Videomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wawerla et al [17] describe a system to monitor the behavior of grizzly bears at the arctic circle with camera traps. They use motion http://jivp.eurasipjournals.com/content/2013/1/49 shapelet features and AdaBoost to detect bears in video footage.…”
Section: Visual Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%