2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2019.2951821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beamwidth Design for Beam Scanning in Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [34], the authors initially modeled and derived the trade-off caused by beamwidth in a multi-user mmWave network. Similar optimizations that balance the beamforming gain and the beam training overhead were also investigated in [14,24,27]. However, their solutions heavily depend on the physical layer assumptions or prior knowledge such as channel model, beam pattern model, and network topology, which restricts their flexibility in practical deployments in MANETs where the channel is rapidly changing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [34], the authors initially modeled and derived the trade-off caused by beamwidth in a multi-user mmWave network. Similar optimizations that balance the beamforming gain and the beam training overhead were also investigated in [14,24,27]. However, their solutions heavily depend on the physical layer assumptions or prior knowledge such as channel model, beam pattern model, and network topology, which restricts their flexibility in practical deployments in MANETs where the channel is rapidly changing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining (10) and (12), the final expression of UE discovery probability in one slot is obtained as…”
Section: A Signal To Interference Plus Noise Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the gain of BF improves the system capacity. Therefore, there is a tradeoff between the search delay and the capacity of mmWave systems [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the traditional EBS scheme requires considerable time for beam training, leading to potentially excessive system overhead. A previous study elaborated on the trade-off between the operating beamwidth and latency/throughput [17], [18]. For transmissions associated with narrower beams, the EBS scheme results in increased latency and reduced throughput, which makes it less attractive, especially for numerous users and APs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we continue by comparing our proposed beamforming training scheme relying on a beneficial frame structure to the most pertinent contributions in TableI . The majority of the existing literature has aimed for achieving low-latency beam training using either formal or heuristic optimization Some abbreviations in Table I are [18] P2P EBS-EBS [19] P2P PS-PS [20], [21] P2P PS-PS [22] P2P EBS-PS [23], [24] P2MP EBS-EBS [25] P2MP EBS-EBS [26] P2MP EBS-EBS [27] P2MP EBS-PS [28] P2MP PS-PS [29], [30] MP2MP…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%