1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002490050095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BEAMS (BEAds Modelling System): a set of computer programs for the generation, the visualization and the computation of the hydrodynamic and conformational properties of bead models of proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 As we previously suggested, 32 we interpret the experimental ⟨R c 2 ⟩ z data as deriving from the weight-average square cross-sectional radius 33 along the principal axis of the FG main body and of the αC domains. To account for an average molecular mass of ∼320 000 g mol −1 (due to the weak polydispersity of our FG samples 34 ), and considering a theoretical hydration of 0.42 g H 2 O/g FG (calculated by PROMOLP 35 ), an anhydrous diameter d a = 4.1 nm and a density ρ a = 0.875 g cm −3 were employed. The latter is considerably lower than the 1.393 g cm −3 computed from the FG composition, likely reflecting the mostly disordered αC regions being positioned away from the FG main body.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 As we previously suggested, 32 we interpret the experimental ⟨R c 2 ⟩ z data as deriving from the weight-average square cross-sectional radius 33 along the principal axis of the FG main body and of the αC domains. To account for an average molecular mass of ∼320 000 g mol −1 (due to the weak polydispersity of our FG samples 34 ), and considering a theoretical hydration of 0.42 g H 2 O/g FG (calculated by PROMOLP 35 ), an anhydrous diameter d a = 4.1 nm and a density ρ a = 0.875 g cm −3 were employed. The latter is considerably lower than the 1.393 g cm −3 computed from the FG composition, likely reflecting the mostly disordered αC regions being positioned away from the FG main body.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm that these shapes are consistent with the observed hydrodynamic properties, bead models were generated from the atomic coordinates within SNARE complexes (Sutton et al, 1998) by using the program SOMO (Spotorno et al, 1997), and then they were aligned in hypothetical (A) Hydrodynamic information for SNARE complex monomers and dimers was determined experimentally, by using MALLS or AUC as indicated. Predicted molecular weight for a monomeric SNARE complex, including vector-derived amino acids, is 45,768 Da.…”
Section: Global Solution Structure Of Synaptic Snare Complex Multimersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] It is based on the ability to realistically calculate the frictional forces and torques experienced by a collection of rigidly connected, arbitrarily placed spheres theoretically immersed in a solvent; importantly, the spheres can be of different radii provided that they do not overlap. [1][2][3][4] The methods employed to represent a macromolecule with beads range from shellmodeling (covering the surface with closely touching small beads, computing their properties, repeating the operation while decreasing the beads size at each iteration, and extrapolating to zero-bead size; see ref. [5] ), to direct correspondence methods (representing selected parts of the macromolecule, such as whole residues or main-chain/ side-chain segments, each with a bead of appropriate volume and position; see ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%