2018
DOI: 10.1364/ol.43.005921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam-shifting technique for speckle reduction and flow rate measurement in optical coherence tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To effectively reconstruct OCT images from noisy versions, researchers have proposed many different methods, which are generally grouped into two categories: hardware-based approaches [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] ] and software-based approaches [ [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] ]. However, the former category of approaches [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] ] requires significant modifications to existing imaging system hardware, which makes them less applicable to ordinary commercialized imaging equipment based on OCT technologies. By contrast, software-based post-processing approaches [ [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively reconstruct OCT images from noisy versions, researchers have proposed many different methods, which are generally grouped into two categories: hardware-based approaches [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] ] and software-based approaches [ [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] ]. However, the former category of approaches [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] ] requires significant modifications to existing imaging system hardware, which makes them less applicable to ordinary commercialized imaging equipment based on OCT technologies. By contrast, software-based post-processing approaches [ [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different causes for speckle variation have been studied, including using a wavelength-diverse light source (frequency compounding) 18,19 , spatial compounding of adjacent regions 20 , dynamic speckle illumination (speckle modulation) 15,21 , and illumination from multiple incident angles (angular compounding) 22 . However, the number of speckle patterns generated by frequency compounding is limited by the total bandwidth of the light sources; spatial compounding induces loss of resolution; speckle modulation also causes resolution loss since introducing random phase patterns into the light wavefront makes the illumination area larger and unstable; angular compounding can also produce concurrent spatial compounding and mismatch in the defocused regions because the detection area varies with angle 23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this takes place, the angle-coded optical pathlength and propagation direction make the mapping between real space and image space change with angle. Although some universal image registration algorithms have been applied for angular compounding 16,23,28,29 , none of them are based on geometrical considerations of the beam path, resulting in errors produced in the registration process. The vertical correction 23 can only guarantee pure angular compounding at the focal plane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the technique relies on coherent detection of scattered light, however, OCT images are confounded by speckle noise: a grainy texture that reduces the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and effective spatial resolution. A widely used method to reduce speckle noise is angular compounding, 1,2 which averages results obtained with the imaging beam probing the sample at different angles. Both the imaging system and the sample can remain stationary during the scan, allowing high imaging throughput with high image quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%