1989
DOI: 10.1117/12.961516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam Combination In Aperture Synthesis From Space: Field Of View Limitations And (U,V) Plane Coverage Optimization

Abstract: The limitations of the coherent field of view in Optical Space Interferometry are presented. The size of the field required is inferred from the number of photoevents and from stellar density. Then we examine the limitations of the FOV in both "Michelson" -or planar arrayand "Fizeau" -the equivalent of a masked giant telescope-cases in order to assess their maximum size; it is shown that in all cases, the field is too small to include a reference star in the "Michelson" final image field (< a few arcsec) when … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the long baselines of Michelson interferometers, Fizeau interferometry systems tend to have compact telescope arrays. An optimal imaging configuration designed for sparse arrays was first proposed by Golay. 3 Sparse arrays are promising for applications that do not require extremely high sensitivity ͑bright source present͒ and allow for a rather limited field of view 4,5 ͑FOV͒. Diffraction-limited performance has been demonstrated for sparse or dilute-aperture telescopes with active phasing control.…”
Section: Sparse Aperture Interferometric Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the long baselines of Michelson interferometers, Fizeau interferometry systems tend to have compact telescope arrays. An optimal imaging configuration designed for sparse arrays was first proposed by Golay. 3 Sparse arrays are promising for applications that do not require extremely high sensitivity ͑bright source present͒ and allow for a rather limited field of view 4,5 ͑FOV͒. Diffraction-limited performance has been demonstrated for sparse or dilute-aperture telescopes with active phasing control.…”
Section: Sparse Aperture Interferometric Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the geometry of Fig. 5, Faucherre et al 5 derived the net OPD error due to the incorrect pupil mapping,…”
Section: Pupil Mapping Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the measurement-based system identification algorithm called Integrated Frequency domain Observability Range Space Extraction and Least Square parameter estimation algorithm (IFORSELS) 10,11 , is performed to derive a state-space representation of the system dynamics. IFORSELS algorithm integrates the Frequency domain Observability Range Space Extraction (FORSE) identi- The FORSE algorithm is a slight variation of the subspace identification algorithm derived by De Moor, et al 12 and its objective is to minimize the following cost to obtain the system matrices, A,B,C,D, (4) where is the frequency response samples from experiments.…”
Section: System Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimal imaging configuration designed for sparse arrays was first proposed by Golay 2 . Sparse arrays are promising for applications that do not require extremely high sensitivity (bright source present) and allow for a rather limited field-of-view (FOV) 3,4 . A notable project in the area of phased telescope array is the Multipurpose Multiple Telescope Testbed (MMTT) 5 by Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimal imaging configuration designed for sparse arrays was first proposed by Golay 2 . Sparse arrays are promising for applications that do not require extremely high sensitivity (bright source present) and allow for a rather limited field-of-view (FOV) 3,5 . A notable project in the area of phased telescope array is the Multipurpose Multiple Telescope Testbed (MMTT) 6 by Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%