2021 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ecmr50962.2021.9568822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Be your own Benchmark: No-Reference Trajectory Metric on Registered Point Clouds

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of assessing trajectory quality in conditions when no ground truth poses are available or when their accuracy is not enough for the specific task -for example, small-scale mapping in outdoor scenes. In our work, we propose a no-reference metric, Mutually Orthogonal Metric (MOM), that estimates the quality of the map from registered point clouds via the trajectory poses. MOM strongly correlates with full-reference trajectory metric Relative Pose Error, making it a trajectory ben… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore no-reference evaluation is used in this work. In particular, Mean Map Entropy (MME) [38] and Mean Plane Variance (MPV) [39] evaluate noise in the aggregated point cloud and Mutually Orthogonal Metric (MOM) [40] correlates reconstruction noise with perturbation in the 3D poses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore no-reference evaluation is used in this work. In particular, Mean Map Entropy (MME) [38] and Mean Plane Variance (MPV) [39] evaluate noise in the aggregated point cloud and Mutually Orthogonal Metric (MOM) [40] correlates reconstruction noise with perturbation in the 3D poses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development is however taken from the homogeneous formulation presented above, one just needs to adjust to this transformation in the gradient and Hessian calculations. Accordingly, the gradient is calculated as in (29), and almost all components of the Hessian remain the same except for (40) now written as…”
Section: Data Centeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, robotics community started to work on creating common datasets and benchmarks for comparing different algorithms. Even though there are approaches allowing the localization and mapping quality to be assessed without comparing it to ground truth [5], in general, we still need a ground truth trajectory for comparison. Since such a trajectory is not available in principle, as there is no source of information able to provide the real noise-free path of a robot, researchers try to obtain a ground truth trajectory estimatea reference trajectory suitable to assess the quality of localization algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore no-reference evaluation is used in this work. In particular, Mean Map Entropy (MME) [37] and Mean Plane Variance (MPV) [38] evaluate noise in the aggregated point cloud and Mutually Orthogonal Metric (MOM) [39] correlates reconstruction noise with perturbation in the 3D poses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluation we consider 100 submaps of length 30 poses, randomly sampled from map 00. To estimate the quality of alignment, no-reference map metrics MME [37], MPV [38] and MOM [39] are used.…”
Section: Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%