2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3080580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BDANet: Multiscale Convolutional Neural Network With Cross-Directional Attention for Building Damage Assessment From Satellite Images

Abstract: Fast and effective responses are required when a natural disaster (e.g., earthquake, hurricane, etc.) strikes. Building damage assessment from satellite imagery is critical before relief effort is deployed. With a pair of pre-and postdisaster satellite images, building damage assessment aims at predicting the extent of damage to buildings. With the powerful ability of feature representation, deep neural networks have been successfully applied to building damage assessment. Most existing works simply concatenat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using cut regions for training images and mixing pixel-level information from other sample enables the network to identify targets from local views, which can improve localization and generalization capabilities of the model [ [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] ]. Classical representative local region pixel-level mixing methods include Mixup [ 64 ], Cutout [ 65 ] and CutMix [ 66 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using cut regions for training images and mixing pixel-level information from other sample enables the network to identify targets from local views, which can improve localization and generalization capabilities of the model [ [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] ]. Classical representative local region pixel-level mixing methods include Mixup [ 64 ], Cutout [ 65 ] and CutMix [ 66 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xBD Dataset: Moreover, we present quantitative and qualitative comparisons of building disaster damage assessment on the xBD dataset. We compare our method with the xBD baseline [10], BDANet [56], RescueNet [54] and the method of Weber et al [55], which are popular and typical methods in building disaster damage assessment. All results indicate that our method can be competitive in building disaster damage assessment.…”
Section: B Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They performed an ablation study over different architecture hyperparameters and loss functions, but did not compare their performance with the state-of-the-art. Xiao et al [35] and Shen et al [36] also presented innovative model architectures to solve the problem. The former used a dynamic cross-fusion mechanism (DCFNet) and the latter a multiscale convolutional network with cross-directional attention (BDANet).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification F 1 Weber [30] 0.835 0.697 RescueNet [29] 0.840 0.740 BDANet [36] 0.864 0.782 DCFNet [35] 0.864 0.795 DamFormer [63] 0.869 0.728 Our model 0.846 (0.002) 0.709 (0.003)…”
Section: Localization Fmentioning
confidence: 99%