2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BCL::Score—Knowledge Based Energy Potentials for Ranking Protein Models Represented by Idealized Secondary Structure Elements

Abstract: The topology of most experimentally determined protein domains is defined by the relative arrangement of secondary structure elements, i.e. α-helices and β-strands, which make up 50–70% of the sequence. Pairing of β-strands defines the topology of β-sheets. The packing of side chains between α-helices and β-sheets defines the majority of the protein core. Often, limited experimental datasets restrain the position of secondary structure elements while lacking detail with respect to loop or side chain conformati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
96
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(62 reference statements)
3
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RMSDs over the backbone atoms of the generated models were calculated using the BCL::Quality algorithm 87 . Since we were not interested in starting structures that significantly deviated from the native, we only picked proteins for which we were able to generate ab initio models with RMSDs of less than ~ 5 Å to the native.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RMSDs over the backbone atoms of the generated models were calculated using the BCL::Quality algorithm 87 . Since we were not interested in starting structures that significantly deviated from the native, we only picked proteins for which we were able to generate ab initio models with RMSDs of less than ~ 5 Å to the native.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full atom solvation score term was set to zero to implicitly account for the membrane environment. RMSD of each model was calculated using the BCL::Quality algorithm 87 . The fit-to-density score of each model was also calculated using Rosetta density-tools which provided the model-map agreement 94 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After each Monte Carlo step, models are scored using knowledge-based potentials evaluating different scoring terms like SSE packing, radius of gyration, amino acid exposure, amino acid interactions, loop closure geometry, secondary structure length and content, as well as penalizing potentials for SSE and amino acid clashes (Woetzel et al, 2012). The potential functions for each scoring term were derived from statistics over protein structures deposited in the PDB using the inverse Boltzmann relation (Equation 1) (Woetzel et al, 2012). E=RT×lnPobsPback…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This normalization ensures that favorable features are assigned negative scores. The term RT is set to 1 for convenience (Woetzel et al, 2012). For example, one scoring term ( S NC ) evaluates the burial of residues.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation