1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980417)79:2<153::aid-ijc10>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bcl-2 expression and prognosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
20
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the usefulness of induction of apoptosis after irradiation therapy as a predictor of short-term prognosis has been reported in patients with cancer other than uterine cancer. 8,[20][21][22][23] In uterine cervical cancer, similar observations were reported. 7,24) However, it has not been established whether apoptosis after initial irradiation dose delivery can predict long-term prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Recently, the usefulness of induction of apoptosis after irradiation therapy as a predictor of short-term prognosis has been reported in patients with cancer other than uterine cancer. 8,[20][21][22][23] In uterine cervical cancer, similar observations were reported. 7,24) However, it has not been established whether apoptosis after initial irradiation dose delivery can predict long-term prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This might explain why Bcl-2 expression is associated with poor prognosis in several types of malignancies (Sakuragi et al, 1998). Our study is the ®rst to report the anti-apoptotic mechanism of Bcl-2 upregulation by ADM. Others have recently demonstrated other pathways: ADM antagonizes serum-deprivation-induced endothelial apoptosis by upregulation of the transcription factor Max, the heterodimeric partner of c-Myc (Shichiri et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We stained a series of cases of endometrial carcinoma seen consecutively at our center with a panel of antibodies. This panel was chosen primarily based on their known role in endometrial carcinogenesis or previously demonstrated significance as prognostic markers in endometrial carcinoma (p53, 26,36 PTEN, 37,38 ER and PR, 39,40 bcl-2, 41-43 HER2 41,44,45 ) or their role in cell-cycle regulation (p21, p27, E2F-1) (reviewed in Israels and Israels 46 ). We did not use MIB-1 (Ki67) immunostaining as we have previously shown that it shows only a weak correlation with mitotic activity in uterine serous carcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%