1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)81071-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayley-Pinneau, Roche-Wainer-Thissen, and Tanner height predictions in normal children and in patients with various patholgoic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
69
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
9
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, as the data were collected retrospectively, not all the boys were followed to FHt. However, as all completed puberty (Tanner stage 5) we were able to use their PFHt, which is accurate at bone age 15.5-16, as their FHt (23,26). The mean age at onset of puberty was within the normal range in the SGA group (boys, 12.0^0.9; girls, 10.4^1.5), albeit significantly lower than in the AGA group (P , 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, as the data were collected retrospectively, not all the boys were followed to FHt. However, as all completed puberty (Tanner stage 5) we were able to use their PFHt, which is accurate at bone age 15.5-16, as their FHt (23,26). The mean age at onset of puberty was within the normal range in the SGA group (boys, 12.0^0.9; girls, 10.4^1.5), albeit significantly lower than in the AGA group (P , 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The remaining boys were followed to completion of puberty. We considered their PFHt at Tanner stage 5 as their FHt, since by that time, their BA was 15.5 -16 years, at which point the PFHt is accurate in both boys with a normal growth pattern as well as short boys, either SGA or AGA, with early or delayed puberty (23,26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In children with a BA of >6 years (n = 17, 4 children of group 1 and all children of groups 2 and 3), the final height prediction was calculated using the radius, ulna, short bones method of Tanner et al [23](RUS/TW2) as well as that of Bayley and Pinneau [24], and compared to the parental target height. We gave preference to the presentation of the results based on the TW2 method, because this method has been shown to be the most accurate in children with normal growth potential [25]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a direct comparison, the BA as determined by the Greulich and Pyle method is generally about 1 'year' less than that as assessed by the Tanner-Whitehouse technique (86,87,89). One should realize, however, that BA determinations are SEX STEROID TREATMENT OF CTS 543…”
Section: A Skeletal Maturity or Bamentioning
confidence: 96%