The Oxford Handbook of Rationality 2004
DOI: 10.1093/0195145399.003.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesianism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because opinion leaders are individuals whose degree of influence in changing the opinion of others may be related to their social context, theory selection began with examination of the philosophical roots of opinion formation by both individuals and groups. Bayesianism is a philosophic theory concerning the rational beliefs of individuals (Joyce, ). Kitcher's () theory of the Organization of Cognitive Labor (OCL) is concerned with the ways in which groups of people arrive at consensus practices via individual group members' decisions about those practices.…”
Section: Preliminary Model Development Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because opinion leaders are individuals whose degree of influence in changing the opinion of others may be related to their social context, theory selection began with examination of the philosophical roots of opinion formation by both individuals and groups. Bayesianism is a philosophic theory concerning the rational beliefs of individuals (Joyce, ). Kitcher's () theory of the Organization of Cognitive Labor (OCL) is concerned with the ways in which groups of people arrive at consensus practices via individual group members' decisions about those practices.…”
Section: Preliminary Model Development Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It thus seems that if Dutch books are to expose irrationality, and not ignorance, then the most that can be assumed in such arguments is that bookies know a person's probabilities insofar as these probabilities are known to the person herself (or, better perhaps, insofar as the person is consciously aware of them). However, I think that ultimately all such considerations are spurious, for in my view Dutch book arguments have no epistemic import; see Douven [1999a] (also Joyce [2004]). Sobel [1987, Sect.…”
Section: Fitch's Paradox and Other Threatsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Else we need to replace "¬T " in (30) by "¬Tr(T )" where Tr is the truth predicate (and make the corresponding substitution in (31)). 41 Besides the two motivations for antirealism discussed in this section, Kvanvig [2006, Ch. 2] also mentions materialism and theism as possible motivations.…”
Section: But Is It Antirealism?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 See also Bicchieri (2004) 4 A statistical probability interpretation using the Thomas Bayes formula (see Joyce, 2004). 5 Running head: HEURISTIC REASONING AND THE OBSERVER'S VIEW decision which would likely provide a 'good enough' outcome, rather than to seek a sole, optimal solution (Luce, Payne, & Bettman, 1999;Mellers, Schwartz, & Cooke, 1999).…”
Section: Sport and Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%