2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian validation of grammar productions for the language of thought

Abstract: Probabilistic proposals of Language of Thoughts (LoTs) can explain learning across different domains as statistical inference over a compositionally structured hypothesis space. While frameworks may differ on how a LoT may be implemented computationally, they all share the property that they are built from a set of atomic symbols and rules by which these symbols can be combined. In this work we propose an extra validation step for the set of atomic productions defined by the experimenter. It starts by expandin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beside the learning of conceptual knowledge and work on subjective randomness, a pLOT approach was also used to model the learning of spatial sequences: to study the crossmodal transfer of sequence knowledge [ 92 ], and to investigate the adequacy of the language of geometry [ 57 ]. Indeed, by using the behavioral data from the octagon task of Amalric et al [ 58 ], Romano et al [ 57 ] showed that the primitives included in the language of geometry were all required in order to best account for human behavior. In spite of its successes, a number of questions and potential limitations of the LoT approach remain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beside the learning of conceptual knowledge and work on subjective randomness, a pLOT approach was also used to model the learning of spatial sequences: to study the crossmodal transfer of sequence knowledge [ 92 ], and to investigate the adequacy of the language of geometry [ 57 ]. Indeed, by using the behavioral data from the octagon task of Amalric et al [ 58 ], Romano et al [ 57 ] showed that the primitives included in the language of geometry were all required in order to best account for human behavior. In spite of its successes, a number of questions and potential limitations of the LoT approach remain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this previous study, human participants were presented with a sequence of eight locations on a regular octagon. Using both behavioral and brain-imaging data, we showed the necessity and adequacy of a computer-like language consisting of geometrical primitives of rotation and symmetry plus the ability to repeat them with variations in starting point or symmetries [ 57 60 ]. This language was shown to predict which sequences appear as regular, and how educated adults, uneducated Amazon Indians and young children performed in an explicit sequence completion task [ 58 ] or in an implicit eye-tracking task [ 60 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding the correct language for a given population is crucial, especially in the context of the debate on the uniqueness of human sequence processing skills, and specific statistical methodologies need to be developed for this purpose. Bayesian inference, which allows to find the most likely concepts and rules from a grammatically structured hypothesis space containing several candidates (Goodman, Tenenbaum, Feldman, & Griffiths, 2008), was used by Romano et al (2018) to…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this previous work, human participants were presented with a sequence of eight locations on a regular octagon. Using both behavioral and brain-imaging data, we showed the necessity and adequacy of a computer-like language consisting of geometrical primitives of rotation and symmetry plus the ability to repeat them with various variations in starting point or symmetries (Amalric et al, 2017;Romano et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2019). This language was shown to predict which sequences appear as regular, and how educated adults, uneducated Amazon Indians and young children performed an explicit sequence completion task (Amalric et al, 2017) or simply gazed a sequence of dots as fast as possible (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: A Short Review Of Sequence Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation