2011
DOI: 10.1890/11-0192.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian state-space modeling of metapopulation dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly

Abstract: The complexity of mathematical models of ecological dynamics varies greatly, and it is often difficult to judge what would be the optimal level of complexity in a particular case. Here we compare the parameter estimates, model fits, and predictive abilities of two models of metapopulation dynamics: a detailed individual‐based model (IBM) and a population‐based stochastic patch occupancy model (SPOM) derived from the IBM. The two models were fitted to a 17‐year time series of data for the Glanville fritillary b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ability of our model to make long-term forward predictions is limited, we show that fitting stage-structured models to patch occupancy data has important benefits for understanding the roles of demography and spatial autocorrelation in naturally occurring metapopulations. Our findings provide results that could inform sensible parameterization of predictive simulation (sensu Moilanen 2004) and integrated (Buckland et al 2004, Harrison et al 2011) metapopulation models. Notably, the framework presented here does not account for FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Although the ability of our model to make long-term forward predictions is limited, we show that fitting stage-structured models to patch occupancy data has important benefits for understanding the roles of demography and spatial autocorrelation in naturally occurring metapopulations. Our findings provide results that could inform sensible parameterization of predictive simulation (sensu Moilanen 2004) and integrated (Buckland et al 2004, Harrison et al 2011) metapopulation models. Notably, the framework presented here does not account for FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Given that imperfect data are the norm rather than an exception, overlooking this might have major consequences for predictive performance. Interestingly, however, models that do account for imperfect detection very rarely incorporate spatial effects such as dispersal (but see Bled et al 2011, Harrison et al 2011, Risk et al 2011. The key feature of our Bayesian model, and of those just noted, which allows dispersal to be explicitly incorporated into the analysis, is the simultaneous treatment of the true occupancy states of all sites as latent variables to be estimated, in this manner allowing spatial effects to be modeled despite detection error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Gibbs sampling has been introduced 30 years ago (Geman and Geman, 1984), its application to handle missing data in ecology has been mostly limited to stochastic patch occupancy models with a low number of free parameters (5e6) and either artificially simulated data or relatively restricted datasets (e.g. 72e228 resampled locations in ter Braak and Etienne, 2003;Harrison et al, 2011;Risk et al, 2011). From the technical point of view, our application of MCMC differs by taking advantage of the absolute time independence of Markov chains (allowing us to align sub-sequences starting with a known observation, see Methods and Appendix).…”
Section: A Data-intensive Approach To Understand Forest Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%