2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2016.0171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Rule Sets for Interpretable Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
209
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
209
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rule-based systems are probably the most interpretable models because their IF-THEN structure semantically resembles natural language and the way human think [20]. There are also many researches to construct the more interpretable rule-based systems [21,22].…”
Section: A Interpretabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rule-based systems are probably the most interpretable models because their IF-THEN structure semantically resembles natural language and the way human think [20]. There are also many researches to construct the more interpretable rule-based systems [21,22].…”
Section: A Interpretabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…such that the error E between the MLP's outputsŷ n and the given targets y n is minimized. In (1), Ω(W) is a so-called regularization term, whose strength can be controlled by a regularization parameter λ ∈ R + . Usually, this term is used to avoid overfitting.…”
Section: A Multi-layer Perceptron (Mlp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to enforce so-called explainability of ML models is to create models for which the explainability objective is an essential part of their design. Ante-hoc models are designed to be inherently explainable; examples for this type of models are logistic regression, rule-based systems [1], or decision trees. In contrast, post-hoc explainability refers to adding the explainability objective after training [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Current Trends. Current work in inductive rule learning is focused on finding simple rules via optimization (Dash et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2017;Malioutov and Meel, 2018), mostly with the goal that simple rules are more interpretable. However, there is also some evidence that shorter rules are not always more convincing than more complex rules (Fürnkranz et al, 2018;Stecher et al, 2016).…”
Section: Induction Of Predictive Rule Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%