2019
DOI: 10.3103/s1066530719010010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Predictive Distribution for a Negative Binomial Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One important direction of future research is the generalization of the present results for nonhomogeneous Poisson process models to those for other stochastic process models such as nonhomogeneous negative binomial process models. For finite dimensional models, [15], [16] extended the theory for finite dimensional Poisson models to finite dimensional negative binomial models and negative multinomial models. These generalizations require techniques not used in the theory for the Poisson models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important direction of future research is the generalization of the present results for nonhomogeneous Poisson process models to those for other stochastic process models such as nonhomogeneous negative binomial process models. For finite dimensional models, [15], [16] extended the theory for finite dimensional Poisson models to finite dimensional negative binomial models and negative multinomial models. These generalizations require techniques not used in the theory for the Poisson models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results in the context of predictive density estimation under the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence have also been obtained. Fourdrinier et al (2011), Hamura and Kubokawa (2019), and Hamura and Kubokawa (2020) treated the normal, negative binomial, and Poisson cases by using identies which relate Bayesian predictive density estimation to Bayesian point estimation. L'Moudden et al (2017) and Hamura and Kubokawa (2021) considered the gamma and exponential cases directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the Poisson case, it was only after the work of Komaki (2015) that many Bayesian shrinkage estimators were shown to dominate usual estimators in the presence of unbalanced sample sizes Kubokawa (2019b, 2020c)). Third, while theoretical properties of Bayesian predictive densities for Poisson models have been investigated in several papers as mentioned earlier, relatively few researchers (Komaki (2012), Hamura and Kubokawa (2019a)) have considered predictive density estimation for other discrete exponential families. In this paper, we treat these three issues when considering Bayesian estimators and predictive density estimators based on negative multinomial observations in unbalanced settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Komaki (2012) investigated asymptotic properties of Bayesian predictive densities for future multinomial observations based on current multinomial observations, the sample space is not a finite set in our setting and we investigate finite sample properties of Bayesian predictive densities. Although Hamura and Kubokawa (2019a) considered Bayesian predictive densities for a negative binomial model, where a future observation also is negative binomial and can take on an infinite number of values, they did not treat the problem of estimating the joint predictive density of multiple negative binomial observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%