2010
DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Online Learning of the Hazard Rate in Change-Point Problems

Abstract: Change-point models are generative models of time-varying data in which the underlying generative parameters undergo discontinuous changes at different points in time known as change points. Changepoints often represent important events in the underlying processes, like a change in brain state reflected in EEG data or a change in the value of a company reflected in its stock price. However, change-points can be difficult to identify in noisy data streams. Previous attempts to identify change-points online usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
166
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
166
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm has to know the hazard rate (the rate at which change points occur), but we obviously did not know this rate in advance. We therefore first ran the algorithm of Wilson et al (2010), which is an extension of the Adams and MacKay (2007) algorithm, to estimate the hazard rate. For both algorithms, we assumed that the generative distribution between change points was a Gaussian with unknown mean and known SD, which we derived from the data of the task-relevant component.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This algorithm has to know the hazard rate (the rate at which change points occur), but we obviously did not know this rate in advance. We therefore first ran the algorithm of Wilson et al (2010), which is an extension of the Adams and MacKay (2007) algorithm, to estimate the hazard rate. For both algorithms, we assumed that the generative distribution between change points was a Gaussian with unknown mean and known SD, which we derived from the data of the task-relevant component.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further assumed that the prior, for the mean of the Gaussian, was a Gaussian itself with a mean of zero (the middle of the line) and a SD of 10ϫ the SD of the generative Gaussian, but the results did not depend on the exact value of this parameter. For the Wilson et al (2010) algorithm, we further assumed that the prior, for the hazard rate, followed a beta distribution with parameters ␣ ϭ 2, and ␤ ϭ 50, but the results were virtually independent of these values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005;Courville, Daw, Gordon, & Touretzky, 2004;Courville, Daw, & Touretzky, 2006;Dayan & Daw, 2008;Glimcher, 2003aGlimcher, , 2003bGlimcher, , 2009Montague et al, 1996;Nassar & Gold, 2013;Nassar et al, 2010Nassar et al, , 2012Seymour et al, 2004;Steyvers & Brown, 2006;Sugrue, Corrado, & New.some, 2005;Wilson et al, 2010). They have a long history (Fstes, 1957;Rescorla & Wagner, 1972).…”
Section: Neuroscientific Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a good deal of decision-making neuroscience seeks to uncover how uncertainty is represented neurally (see Wilson et al, 2010;Nassar et al, 2012). A recent suggestion is that operating in an unstable environment is associated with tonic release (over a time course of minutes) of norepinephrine Dayan, 2003, 2005).…”
Section: A Parametric Discount Function?mentioning
confidence: 99%