2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/vis49827.2021.9623282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Modelling of Alluvial Diagram Complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study duration averaged roughly 15:55 (±2:38) minutes, resulting in an average hourly pay of $12.73 (±$2.11). SurveyMonkey 4 was used to display the study and store participant responses. We excluded 15 participants as their performance indicated they did not understand the task (i.e., more than 70% of ratings had the values of 0, -10 or +10) during/after training, or they took more than 20 minutes to complete the study (>2σ ).…”
Section: Set-up and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Study duration averaged roughly 15:55 (±2:38) minutes, resulting in an average hourly pay of $12.73 (±$2.11). SurveyMonkey 4 was used to display the study and store participant responses. We excluded 15 participants as their performance indicated they did not understand the task (i.e., more than 70% of ratings had the values of 0, -10 or +10) during/after training, or they took more than 20 minutes to complete the study (>2σ ).…”
Section: Set-up and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work has extensively examined the design elements that make some visualizations intrinsically more memorable than others across charts in the wild [9,10,32]. Concurrently, there have been attempts to define and evaluate higher-level concepts like engagement [11,35,61,64] and effectiveness [4,17,83] across a plethora of (often synthetic and minimalist) chart types. However, the difference in the nature of charts studied through these different lenses poses challenges in reconciling good empirical results and rules of thumb with good exemplars of real-world visualizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation