2017
DOI: 10.3390/risks5040053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Modelling, Monte Carlo Sampling and Capital Allocation of Insurance Risks

Abstract: Abstract:The main objective of this work is to develop a detailed step-by-step guide to the development and application of a new class of efficient Monte Carlo methods to solve practically important problems faced by insurers under the new solvency regulations. In particular, a novel Monte Carlo method to calculate capital allocations for a general insurance company is developed, with a focus on coherent capital allocation that is compliant with the Swiss Solvency Test. The data used is based on the balance sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The task is similar to the problem tackled in this paper, as they both involve a partition of a total amount (in our case, it is a partition of the largest operational risk loss). The difference is that in Peters et al (2017) the number of partitions is known in advance, while in ours it is not. A further similarity is that the stationary distribution sought in Peters et al (2017) is lognormal, and the PM method is used to approximate it in the MCMC process.…”
Section: Pm: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The task is similar to the problem tackled in this paper, as they both involve a partition of a total amount (in our case, it is a partition of the largest operational risk loss). The difference is that in Peters et al (2017) the number of partitions is known in advance, while in ours it is not. A further similarity is that the stationary distribution sought in Peters et al (2017) is lognormal, and the PM method is used to approximate it in the MCMC process.…”
Section: Pm: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The difference is that in Peters et al (2017) the number of partitions is known in advance, while in ours it is not. A further similarity is that the stationary distribution sought in Peters et al (2017) is lognormal, and the PM method is used to approximate it in the MCMC process.…”
Section: Pm: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Robert J. Rietz and his group (Rietz et al (2017)) study the effect of gainsharing (via simulation) on selecting discount rates for defined benefit plans. Gareth W. Peters, Rodrigo S. Targino and Mario V. Wuthrich (Peters et al (2017)) provide a novel Monte Carlo method to calculate (coherent) capital allocations for a general insurance company. Carolyn W. Chang and Jack S. K. Chang (Chang and Chang (2017)) utilize an approach that integrates commonly used tools from actuarial science and mathematical finance to price a default-risky catastrophe reinsurance contract.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%