2019
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12917-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian modeling of the nuclear equation of state for neutron star tidal deformabilities and GW170817

Abstract: We present predictions for neutron star tidal deformabilities obtained from a Bayesian analysis of the nuclear equation of state, assuming a minimal model at high-density that neglects the possibility of phase transitions. The Bayesian posterior probability distribution is constructed from priors obtained from microscopic many-body theory based on realistic two-and three-body nuclear forces, while the likelihood functions incorporate empirical information about the equation of state from nuclear experiments. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(190 reference statements)
8
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9. This clearly shows that varying R sym affects the nuclear symmetry energy only at densities larger than 0.6 ∼ 0.7 fm −3 which is within the range of maximum central density of neutron stars [20]. Since R5a, R5b, and R5c give similar symmetry energy below this density, they would give similar results for neutron stars.…”
Section: Expansion In Asymmetric Partmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9. This clearly shows that varying R sym affects the nuclear symmetry energy only at densities larger than 0.6 ∼ 0.7 fm −3 which is within the range of maximum central density of neutron stars [20]. Since R5a, R5b, and R5c give similar symmetry energy below this density, they would give similar results for neutron stars.…”
Section: Expansion In Asymmetric Partmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…[1]. Fitted values of parameters and the corresponding χ 2 n defined as [1] 20) are shown in Table IV. They are referred to as model PN for N = (3,4,5,6).…”
Section: Expansion In Asymmetric Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 [86]. Furthermore, many theoretical works also presented their constraints on the density dependence of symmetry energy, like the chiral effective theory [87,88]. Therefore, in…”
Section: The Relativistic Brueckner-hartree-fock Model In Nu-cleamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also many studies reported the maximum mass of NSs from analyzing data extracted from gravitational wave (GW) events (see the recent review in Refs. [6,7], and the references therein). Note that Lim and Holt [7] discussed the Bayesian modeling of the nuclear equation of state (EOS) systematically, assuming a minimal model at high-density and neglect the possibility of phase transition for NS tidal deformability and GW170817 by generating 300000 NS EOSs by sampling from Bayesian posterior probability distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,7], and the references therein). Note that Lim and Holt [7] discussed the Bayesian modeling of the nuclear equation of state (EOS) systematically, assuming a minimal model at high-density and neglect the possibility of phase transition for NS tidal deformability and GW170817 by generating 300000 NS EOSs by sampling from Bayesian posterior probability distributions. The obtained tidal deformability and the radius range of the canonical NS are consistent with observational constraints from GW170817, but 30% of the EOS fail to generate 2.0 M maximum mass constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%