2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian modeling of COVID-19 cases with a correction to account for under-reported cases

Abstract: The novel of COVID-19 disease started in late 2019 making the worldwide governments came across a high number of critical and death cases, beyond constant fear of the collapse in their health systems. Since the beginning of the pandemic, researchers and authorities are mainly concerned with carrying out quantitative studies (modeling and predictions) overcoming the scarcity of tests that lead us to under-reporting cases. To address these issues, we introduce a Bayesian approach to the SIR model with correction… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to dengue, with COVID-19, a considerable number of patients are asymptomatic, and the number of cases reported is underestimated. In Presidente Prudente and countrywide, they may not reflect the real spread of the pandemic [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to dengue, with COVID-19, a considerable number of patients are asymptomatic, and the number of cases reported is underestimated. In Presidente Prudente and countrywide, they may not reflect the real spread of the pandemic [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both estimated serology test positivity rates were quite different from the estimated prevalence (9.2% and 36.2% for the pre- and post-vaccine launch periods) in our serologic data. There were three main explanations: (1) the under-report factor estimated from CDC might not be accurate for Michigan [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]; (2) most people received vaccination in the last two months of our study, but the number of serology tests in these two months was limited in our study; and (3) according to our association analysis, people who had serologic tests were more likely to have prior medical issues compared to the general population. Therefore, the estimated prevalence in our study might not be representative for Washtenaw County or the State of Michigan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the reported COVID-19 case data for each 27 states of Brazil from [23]. We assume that only a fraction, f = 0.2, of newly infected cases are reported [16,39]. Therefore, the expression f t 0 Ωi λI(x, t)dx gives the accumulated reported cases of state i, i = 1, 2, .., 27, at day t, where Ω i ⊂ Ω is the domain of state i (we do not take account for the reported cases before t = 0 for simplicity).…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%