2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Modeling and Intrabacterial Drug Metabolism Applied to Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: We present the application of Bayesian modeling to identify chemical tools and/or drug discovery entities pertinent to drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. The quinoline JSF-3151 was predicted by modeling and then empirically demonstrated to be active against in vitro cultured clinical methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant strains while also exhibiting efficacy in a mouse peritonitis model of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection. We highlight the utility of an intrabacterial drug metabolism (I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model performed well in our opinion, making correct predictions among labeled active (26%) and inactive (95%) candidates as based on single-concentration assays. This performance is consistent with our experience with our in vitro efficacy models for a range of bacteria. ,,, The machine learning approach offers hit rates considerably better than typical empirical screening (≤0.5%) while demonstrating a significant ability to predict inactive compounds. For resource-limited screening efforts, especially for parasitic diseases such as malaria, we view this as a meaningful savings in time and cost to identify active compounds for downstream study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model performed well in our opinion, making correct predictions among labeled active (26%) and inactive (95%) candidates as based on single-concentration assays. This performance is consistent with our experience with our in vitro efficacy models for a range of bacteria. ,,, The machine learning approach offers hit rates considerably better than typical empirical screening (≤0.5%) while demonstrating a significant ability to predict inactive compounds. For resource-limited screening efforts, especially for parasitic diseases such as malaria, we view this as a meaningful savings in time and cost to identify active compounds for downstream study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The efforts herein constitute, to the best of our knowledge, the first reported utilization of machine learning methods to predict in vitro antimalarial liver-stage efficacy. It builds on our previous efforts predicting antibacterial in vitro efficacy ,,, and molecular properties critical to the attainment of high-quality chemical tools and drug discovery agents. Leveraging a data set of 5972 compounds, a random forest model was constructed, validated, and then utilized to predict the liver-stage efficacy of drug-like small molecules from a ChemDiv diversity library.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data from the MicroSource compound library screen were utilized to construct a Bayesian model. This methodology has been previously employed in our laboratory with growth inhibition screening data with other bacteria. Model construction relied on the practical definition of an active compound at a 10 μM concentration achieving ≥50% growth inhibition in the Vero cell infection screen and exhibiting <25% growth inhibition of uninfected Vero cells. Model construction involved the examination of eight previously used calculated molecular features (ALogP, molecular weight, number of rotatable bonds, number of aromatic rings, total number of all types of rings, number of hydrogen-bond donors, number of hydrogen-bond acceptors, and the molecular fractional polar surface area) and either FCFP6 or ECFP6 fingerprints .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early contributions in this realm include reports from Prathipati and us that focused primarily on Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Bayesian models. 22,52,53 The reports in recent years have expanded to include other bacteria, including but not limited to Staphylococcus aureus, 23 Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 24 and Escherichia coli. 54,55 The machine learning methods leveraged in these publications now include approaches other than Bayesian models, 23,24 such as support vector machines, 56 decision trees, 55,56 and directed message passaging deep neural networks.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation