2019
DOI: 10.1101/689083
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian-Maximum-Entropy reweighting of IDP ensembles based on NMR chemical shifts

Abstract: Bayesian and Maximum Entropy approaches allow for a statistically sound and systematic fitting of experimental and computational data. Unfortunately, assessing the relative confidence in these two types of data remains difficult as several steps add unknown error. Here we propose the use of a validation-set method to determine the balance, and thus the amount of fitting. We apply the method to synthetic NMR chemical shift data of an intrinsically disordered protein. We show that the method gives consistent res… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these equations the parameter θ sets the balance between fitting the data (minimizing χ 2 ) and keeping as much as possible of the original simulation (maximizing ϕ eff ). We refer the reader to previous literature about the methods overall and how best to select this parameter ( Andrae et al, 2010 ; Hummer and Köfinger, 2015 ; Bottaro et al, 2018 ; Cesari et al, 2018 ; Köfinger et al, 2019 ; Crehuet et al, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2019 ; Bottaro et al, 2020 ; Orioli et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these equations the parameter θ sets the balance between fitting the data (minimizing χ 2 ) and keeping as much as possible of the original simulation (maximizing ϕ eff ). We refer the reader to previous literature about the methods overall and how best to select this parameter ( Andrae et al, 2010 ; Hummer and Köfinger, 2015 ; Bottaro et al, 2018 ; Cesari et al, 2018 ; Köfinger et al, 2019 ; Crehuet et al, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2019 ; Bottaro et al, 2020 ; Orioli et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to the χ 2 r = 1 method is cross-validation, i.e. fitting the optimal ensemble to a separate set of data that has not been used in the analysis [62,82,131,192,193]. The reweighting or experiment-biased simulation may then be done for several values of θ to monitor when the goodness of fit to the unused data starts to decrease.…”
Section: Balance Between Simulations and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the data needs to be divided into independent subsets, which may sometimes be difficult for highly correlated or interdependent data. Second, as different sources of data may report on very different aspects of the data, they may in practice not be useful for cross validation [193]. Finally, in a more Bayesian approach, the probability at each value of θ may be calculated to find the most probable value [69], or to integrate out θ, treating it as a nuisance parameter [22].…”
Section: Balance Between Simulations and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 Maximum entropy optimization has become widely popular due to its relation to statistical mechanics and information theory. [63][64][65][66][67][68][69] We further introduced an iterative algorithm based on maximum entropy optimization to create a transferable force field capable of reproducing the radius of gyration for various IDPs (MOFF-IDP). 44 As detailed in the SI, the essence of this algorithm is to reparameterize the protein-specific linear bias derived from maximum entropy optimization with a transferable contact potential between pairs of amino acids,…”
Section: Amino Acid Contact Potential From Maximum Entropy Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%