Bayesian Linear Regression Modelling for Sperm Quality Parameters Using Age, Body Weight, Testicular Morphometry, and Combined Biometric Indices in Donkeys

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to define and compare the predictive power of two different Bayesian models for donkey sperm quality after the evaluation of linear and combined testicular biometry indices and their relationship with age and body weight (BW). Testicular morphometry was ultrasonographically obtained from 23 donkeys (six juveniles and 17 adults), while 40 ejaculates from eight mature donkeys were analyzed for sperm output and quality assessment. Bayesian linear regression analyses were considered to build two statistical models using gel-free volume, concentration, total sperm number, motility, total motile sperm, and morphology as dependent variables. Predictive model 1 comprised the covariate of age and the independent factors testicular measurements (length, height and width), while model 2 included the covariate of age and the factors of BW, testicular volume, and gonadosomatic ratio. Although goodness-of-fit was similar, the combination of predictors in model 1 evidenced higher likelihood to predict gel-free volume (mL), concentration (×106/mL), and motility (%). Alternatively, the combination of predictors in model 2 evidenced higher predictive power for total sperm number (×109), morphologically normal spermatozoa (%), and total motile sperm count (×109). The application of the present models may be useful to gather relevant information that could be used hereafter for assisted reproductive technologies.

Bayesian Analysis of the Effects of Olive Oil-Derived Antioxidants on Cryopreserved Buck Sperm Parameters

“…Sample descriptive posterior statistics are modeled from the means and variances of the measured unpaired groups and are provided as sources of variation, while the prior element was modeled as an uninformative prior using the Jeffreys-Zellener-Siow (JZS) method or, equivalently, from the computation of a reference prior based on a gamma distribution with a standard error of 1. As suggested by Martins-Bessa et al [37], the 95% credibility interval shows that there is a 95% probability that these regression coefficients (posterior distribution mean value for each covariate and factor) in the population lie within the corresponding credibility intervals. When 0 is not contained in the credibility interval, a significant effect for such factor is detected.…”

A Physcomitrella PIN protein acts in spermatogenesis and sporophyte retention

“…In mammals, this ability is gained in the epididymis, and is controlled by different external and internal factors (Pereira et al ., 2017; O’Flaherty, 2019; Björkgren & Sipilä, 2019). Due to the complexity of the process and a large number of influences, sperm populations are not homogenous, but vary regarding phenotype, motility or activity (Gómez Montoto et al ., 2011; Genau et al ., 2021; Martins-Bessa et al ., 2021). A key role in metazoan and Physcomitrella spermatogenesis is played by the evolutionary conserved DNA Topoisomerase 1α, which facilitates chromatin condensation towards the compact sperm head (Gu et al ., 2022).…”

The Winner Takes it All: Risk Factors and Bayesian Modelling of the Probability of Success in Escaping from Big Cat Predation

“…Bayesian inference maximizes the ability to detect significant effects in limited sample size contexts. Consequently, a much smaller ratio of parameters to observations is required (1:3 instead of 1:5) [ 66 ]. As a result, potentially distorting conditions derived from sampling, for instance, unequal numbers of observations across group members (i.e., predators), can be sorted.…”

“…In the specific case of linear regression, the choice for Jeffrey–Zellner–Siow (JZS) prior is especially appropriate, given this prior is symmetric, centred at zero and scale invariant. This means positive and negative values of the slope parameters have a priori the same probability to occur and implies that Bayes factor values do not change if variables, factors or covariates, measured in different units, are evaluated together, as common in multifactorial field studies [ 66 ].…”