1998
DOI: 10.2307/2527349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Leading Indicators: Measuring and Predicting Economic Conditions in Iowa

Abstract: This paper designs and implements a Bayesian dynamic latent factor model for a vector of data describing the Iowa economy. Posterior distributions of parameters and the latent factor are analyzed by Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, and coincident and leading indicators are given by posterior mean values of current and predictive distributions for the latent factor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
151
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
151
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimate the dynamic factor model using the Bayesian MCMC algorithm of Whiteman (2003, 2008), which builds on the procedures developed by Otrok and Whiteman (1998) and Chib and Greenberg (1994). The algorithm constructs a Markov chain with data augmentation, whose limiting distribution is the target posterior density of the parameters.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimate the dynamic factor model using the Bayesian MCMC algorithm of Whiteman (2003, 2008), which builds on the procedures developed by Otrok and Whiteman (1998) and Chib and Greenberg (1994). The algorithm constructs a Markov chain with data augmentation, whose limiting distribution is the target posterior density of the parameters.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‡exibility of the model comes at the cost of being high dimensional: for two types of ‡ows and 55 countries, it requires estimation of 397 parameters. We estimate the parameters of the dynamic factor model using the Bayesian MCMC algorithm of Whiteman (2003, 2008), which builds on the procedures developed by Otrok and Whiteman (1998). Bayesian estimation o¤ers the advantage of dealing e¤ectively with the high dimension of the model and making estimation feasible and e¢ cient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the moment, Bayesian analysis of dynamic factor models still do not allow for cross-sectionally correlated errors. In preparing the monte carlo study, we also obtained Bayesian factor estimates using the method discussed in Otrok and Whiteman (1998), as well as the one described in Kim and Nelson (2000). The Bayesian methods give posterior means very similar results to the principal component estimates, but are tremendously more time consuming to compute with little to no gain in precision.…”
Section: How Precise Are the Factor Estimates?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our econometric methods will also use DFMs. DFMs have become an increasingly common way of quantifying the extent of co-movements in macroeconomic variables (e.g., among others, Otrok and Whiteman, 1998;Kose, Otrok and Whiteman, 2003;Crucini, Kose and Otork, 2011;Mumtaz, Simonelli and Surico, 2011) and …nancial time series (e.g., among others, Aguilar and West, 2000;Gourieroux and Jasiak, 2001;Diebold, Rudebusch and Aruoba, 2006;and, Koopman, Lucas and Schwaab, 2012). In our setting, DFMs can quantify the degree of co-movement in employment growth across industries and regions and allow us to determine the sources of ‡uctuations in employment growth, i.e., how much of the ‡uctuations in employment growth can be attributed to industry factors, regional factors, national factors or external factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%