2019
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/ypxd8
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Hypothesis Testing for Gaussian Graphical Models:Conditional Independence and Order Constraints

Abstract:

Gaussian graphical models (GGM; partial correlation networks) have become increasingly popular in the social and behavioral sciences for studying conditional (in)dependencies between variables. In this work, we introduce exploratory and confirmatory Bayesian tests for partial correlations. For the former, we first extend the customary GGM formulation that focuses on conditional dependence to also consider the null hypothesis of conditional independence for each partial correlation. Here a novel testing stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be valuable for future research to continue to develop methods for comparing a wider variety of the properties that characterize networks and their structural differences, which is an ongoing challenge for the quantification of differences between networks (Schieber et al, 2017). Another promising direction for comparing estimated network structures is in the emergence of methods for Bayesian hypothesis testing in GGMs (Williams & Mulder, 2019). Estimating networks in this framework would facilitate confirmatory testing of models consistent with network theory, as well as the comparison of competing theoretical models in real data, representing an important step forward for the field.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directions For Methodological Developmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be valuable for future research to continue to develop methods for comparing a wider variety of the properties that characterize networks and their structural differences, which is an ongoing challenge for the quantification of differences between networks (Schieber et al, 2017). Another promising direction for comparing estimated network structures is in the emergence of methods for Bayesian hypothesis testing in GGMs (Williams & Mulder, 2019). Estimating networks in this framework would facilitate confirmatory testing of models consistent with network theory, as well as the comparison of competing theoretical models in real data, representing an important step forward for the field.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directions For Methodological Developmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following methods were introduced in Williams and Mulder (2019). That work not only presented an exploratory approach using the Bayes factor, but it also proposed methodology for confirmatory hypothesis testing in GGMs.…”
Section: Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It overcomes one limitation of the Wishart prior (Section 3.1). Namely, as shown in Williams and Mulder (2019), the prior standard deviation is necessarily a function of the network size (i.e., p −1/2 ). This limits its usefulness for Bayesian hypothesis testing in particular.…”
Section: Matrix-f Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods in the work belong to the former, and thus, the prior distribution plays little role in inference. With colleagues, I have developed Bayesian methodology for hypothesis testing in GGMs (Williams & Mulder, 2019a;Williams, Rast, Pericchi, & Mulder, 2019). These methods are also implemented in the package BGGM.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%