2017
DOI: 10.3982/te1544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian games with a continuum of states

Abstract: We show that every Bayesian game with purely atomic types has a measurable Bayesian equilibrium when the common knowledge relation is smooth. Conversely, for any common knowledge relation that is not smooth, there exists a type space that yields this common knowledge relation and payoffs such that the resulting Bayesian game does not have any Bayesian equilibrium. We show that our smoothness condition also rules out two paradoxes involving Bayesian games with a continuum of types: the impossibility of having a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also argue that this is more or less all we can hope for. It is known from earlier results by, among others, Simon (2003) and Hellman and Levy (2013), that beyond the restriction of countable type spaces, BNE-and hence also perfect BNE-may not exist.…”
Section: Existencementioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also argue that this is more or less all we can hope for. It is known from earlier results by, among others, Simon (2003) and Hellman and Levy (2013), that beyond the restriction of countable type spaces, BNE-and hence also perfect BNE-may not exist.…”
Section: Existencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such a Bayesian game admits a BNE, in view of part (I) of Theorem 1 in Hellman and Levy (2013). In the next theorem we show that such a Bayesian game even admits a perfect BNE.…”
Section: Existencementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lehrer and Samet () presented an example of a knowledge space, based on an example in Simon (), over which there is a measurable common prior yet over each individual common knowledge component no common prior exists. Hellman and Levy () contains a similar knowledge space in which, in each common knowledge component, players can find an acceptable bet (or trade) to which they agree, but, over the entire space, the players must agree to disagree as there exists no measurable mutually agreeable bet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%