2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/8032753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Estimation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Rose Bengal, Complement Fixation, and Indirect ELISA Tests for the Diagnosis of Bovine Brucellosis in Ethiopia

Abstract: Test evaluation in the absence of a gold standard test was conducted for the diagnosis and screening of bovine brucellosis using three commercially available tests including RBPT, CFT, and I-ELISA in National Animal Health Diagnostic and Investigation Center (NAHDIC) Ethiopia. A total of 278 sera samples from five dairy herds were collected and tested. Each serum sample was subjected to the three tests and the results obtained were recorded and the test outcomes were cross-classified to estimate the sensitivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(26 reference statements)
4
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayesian method provides a stable point and interval estimate without the necessity of large sample size [ 23 ]. The sensitivity of RBPT in the present study (58.3% (26.4–92.7%)) is similar to the finding of Sanogo et al [ 34 ] (54.9% (23.5–95.1)) and lower than the finding of Getachew et al [ 57 ] (89.6% (79.9–95.8)). The specificity of RBPT (92.1% (88.7–95.2) was fairly high and similar to the finding of Getachew et al [ 57 ] (84.5% (68–94.8)) and Sanogo et al [ 34 ] (97.7% (95.3–99.4)).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Bayesian method provides a stable point and interval estimate without the necessity of large sample size [ 23 ]. The sensitivity of RBPT in the present study (58.3% (26.4–92.7%)) is similar to the finding of Sanogo et al [ 34 ] (54.9% (23.5–95.1)) and lower than the finding of Getachew et al [ 57 ] (89.6% (79.9–95.8)). The specificity of RBPT (92.1% (88.7–95.2) was fairly high and similar to the finding of Getachew et al [ 57 ] (84.5% (68–94.8)) and Sanogo et al [ 34 ] (97.7% (95.3–99.4)).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, Cakan et al [51] showed ELISA test for brucellosis is more sensitive only when both IgG and IgM were used, though their titer alone didn't represent disease status. Awah-Ndukum et al [57] , Sanogo et al [58] , and Gatechew et al [59] reported sensitivity and specificity of ELISA IgG were 95.6% &97.1%, 96.1% &95%, and 96.8% &96.3%; respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The overall sero-prevalence of Brucella antibodies determined with RBPT and I-ELISA in Becho district, Oromia regional state were 3.39% and 1.04%, respectively. Since I-ELISA is the recommended diagnostic test for brucellosis with higher sensitivity and specificity (Getachew et al, 2016;Uzal et al, 1995), the overall seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis in the study area is 1.04%. This low sero-prevalence is in agreement with the earlier report of (Meles and Kibeb, 2018) with the same prevalence in the Chencha district, GamoGofa zone, South-Eastern Ethiopia, (Adugna et al 2013;Kang'ethe et al, 2007) In this study breed was supposed to be one of the risk factors, consequently sero-prevalence was found to be higher in cross-breed animals (3.13%) than local breeds (0.35%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%