2010
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.27.001593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian estimation of regularization and point spread function parameters for Wiener–Hunt deconvolution

Abstract: This paper tackles the problem of image deconvolution with joint estimation of PSF parameters and hyperparameters. Within a Bayesian framework, the solution is inferred via a global a posteriori law for unknown parameters and object. The estimate is chosen as the posterior mean, numerically calculated by means of a Monte-Carlo Markov chain algorithm. The estimates are efficiently computed in the Fourier domain and the effectiveness of the method is shown on simulated examples. Results show precise estimates fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4) of the posterior law. Another important advantage of the Bayesian interpretation deals with the estimation of hyperparameter and instrument parameters (Orieux et al 2010). …”
Section: Data Inversion For High-resolution Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4) of the posterior law. Another important advantage of the Bayesian interpretation deals with the estimation of hyperparameter and instrument parameters (Orieux et al 2010). …”
Section: Data Inversion For High-resolution Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in as much as it relies on two sources of information, the method is based on a trade-off tuned by means of an hyperparameter. It is empirically set in the present paper and work in progress, based on Robert & Casella (2000) and Orieux et al (2010), is devoted to the question of the hyperparameter and instrument parameter auto-calibration (myopic and unsupervised inversion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general case, K is dependant wrt. regularization parameters θ which is a major difficulty that blocks θ estimation [16], [21], [22]. For the well-posedness of the inverse problem we consider the energy E θ (x) = γ x c∈C φ (d t c x; θ) with the set C of cliques c and neighborhoods d c [7] and γ x > 0.…”
Section: Notations and Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], authors present a fast MCMC deconvolution method limited to quadratic prior. Work of J.-F. Giovannelli [22] presents an unsupervised convex deconvolution approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose a myopic modification of the Bayesian MRFM reconstruction approach in Dobigeon et al, 12 whereby one performs a simple additional step in the initial Gibbs sampler, producing a Bayesian estimate of the PSF and a Bayesian reconstruction of the image. Our approach can be related to the recent paper of Orieux et al 19 who introduced a Metropolis-within-Gibbs algorithm to estimate the parameters that tune the device response. This strategy focuses on reconstruction with smoothness constraints and requires recomputation of the entire PSF at each step of the algorithm.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%