2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019jb018428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Elastic Full‐Waveform Inversion Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Abstract: We present a proof of concept for Bayesian elastic full‐waveform inversion in 2‐D. This is based on (1) Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling of the posterior distribution, (2) the computation of misfit derivatives using adjoint techniques, and (3) a mass matrix tuning of the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm that accounts for the different sensitivities of seismic velocities and density. We apply our method to two synthetic end‐member scenarios with different dimension D that are particularly relevant in the cont… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our inversion utilizes relatively coarse spherical harmonics, which ensure that at the finest resolutions tested the effective 'voxel' aspect ratio at the CMB induced by our assumption of a 300-km-thick layer is of order one, so that we are not inverting for an unrealistic vertically elongated parametrization. Current software developments are increasingly allowing for more complex, large scale non-linear Monte Carlo inversions (Gebraad et al 2020), however robust, well-tested implementations are currently limited to linear models such as the one considered here for performance reasons.…”
Section: Probabilistic Lowermost Mantle P-wave Tomography 1633mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our inversion utilizes relatively coarse spherical harmonics, which ensure that at the finest resolutions tested the effective 'voxel' aspect ratio at the CMB induced by our assumption of a 300-km-thick layer is of order one, so that we are not inverting for an unrealistic vertically elongated parametrization. Current software developments are increasingly allowing for more complex, large scale non-linear Monte Carlo inversions (Gebraad et al 2020), however robust, well-tested implementations are currently limited to linear models such as the one considered here for performance reasons.…”
Section: Probabilistic Lowermost Mantle P-wave Tomography 1633mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another viable strategy to reduce the burn‐in period could be starting the MCMC sampling from the model predicted by a local inversion. More advanced MCMC algorithms that incorporate the principles of Hamiltonian dynamics into the standard Metropolis–Hasting method (Betancourt, 2017; Fichtner et al ., 2019; Gebraad et al ., 2020; Aleardi et al ., 2020; Aleardi and Salusti, 2020b) could be useful to speed up the probabilistic ERT inversion. The major computational requirement of the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm is the need for computing the derivative (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This alternative approach is based on the update direction (12), where the focus of argument is shifted from the weighting curves to the prior and likelihood vector components. With w = w x + w y all that is known is that the inequality w ≤ w x + w y holds, using the standard 2-norm z = i |z i | 2 1/2 .…”
Section: Norm Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%