2013
DOI: 10.1109/wcl.2013.032013.130073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Cramer-Rao Bound for Mobile Terminal Tracking in Mixed LOS/NLOS Environments

Abstract: Abstract-A computational algorithm is presented for the Bayesian Cramér-Rao lower bound (BCRB) in filtering applications with measurement noise from mixture distributions with jump Markov switching structure. Such mixture distributions are common for radio propagation in mixed line-and non-lineof-sight environments. The newly derived BCRB is tighter than earlier more general bounds proposed in literature, and thus gives a more realistic bound on actual estimation performance. The resulting BCRB can be used to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this bound can only be practical if there are enough LOS measurements for unambiguous localization, hence, for low number of LOS, i.e., less than two it can not be useful. Even though the posterior Cramer-Rao bound (PCRB) on positioning RMSE has been derived approximately in [44], [45], these derivations are based on the assumption that the NLOS bias has a Gaussian distribution with known mean and variance. Evaluating this PCRB for other NLOS distributions such as exponential is even more challenging.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this bound can only be practical if there are enough LOS measurements for unambiguous localization, hence, for low number of LOS, i.e., less than two it can not be useful. Even though the posterior Cramer-Rao bound (PCRB) on positioning RMSE has been derived approximately in [44], [45], these derivations are based on the assumption that the NLOS bias has a Gaussian distribution with known mean and variance. Evaluating this PCRB for other NLOS distributions such as exponential is even more challenging.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The received signal is oversampled by 4. The simulation results are compared with MCRB [18][19][20], with N g = 3 and K = 30. σ versus the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in different iterations are shown in Figs. 2and 3, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Performance Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the timing synchronisation accomplished by the signal model, many achievements have been obtained for the CRB of frequency offset and carrier phase estimations, as shown in [14–18]. Moreover, CRB of joint time delay and frequency estimation of sinusoidal signals is provided in [19], and Bayesian CRBs for parameter estimation of single‐source signals are derived as well in [20–22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%