2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian common spatial patterns for multi-subject EEG classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, machine learning-based BCI models were introduced to reduce individual training session for each BCI use, in which a model has to be calibrated based on the data at the beginning of each session (Ramoser et al, 2000;Blankertz et al, 2002). Recent studies have proposed SMR-based BCI without any session-and subject-specific calibration utilizing the concept of transfer learning (Kang et al, 2009;Li et al, 2010;Lu et al, 2010;Niazi et al, 2013;Kang and Choi, 2014;Fazli et al, 2015;Lotte, 2015;Jayaram et al, 2016;Saha et al, 2017aSaha et al, ,b, 2019Fahimi et al, 2018;He and Wu, 2019).…”
Section: Covariate Shift and Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, machine learning-based BCI models were introduced to reduce individual training session for each BCI use, in which a model has to be calibrated based on the data at the beginning of each session (Ramoser et al, 2000;Blankertz et al, 2002). Recent studies have proposed SMR-based BCI without any session-and subject-specific calibration utilizing the concept of transfer learning (Kang et al, 2009;Li et al, 2010;Lu et al, 2010;Niazi et al, 2013;Kang and Choi, 2014;Fazli et al, 2015;Lotte, 2015;Jayaram et al, 2016;Saha et al, 2017aSaha et al, ,b, 2019Fahimi et al, 2018;He and Wu, 2019).…”
Section: Covariate Shift and Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing transfer learning approaches are based on regularization or inter-session/subject transfer of model parameters, indirectly transferring knowledge pertaining to the sources of intra-and inter-subject variability (Samek et al, 2013;Lotte, 2015). Many works on transfer learning for SMRbased BCI proposed the use of a very few training samples from the target subject (Kang et al, 2009;Lu et al, 2010;Kang and Choi, 2014;Fahimi et al, 2018;He and Wu, 2019). Recent studies have utilized resting EEG from the target subject incorporated into transfer learning model before proceeding to the actual experiment (Suk et al, 2014;Morioka et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Concept Of Inter-subject Associativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wolpaw et al in the early 90's chose weights for the α and µ rhythms and trained participants to modulate the bandpower in these frequency bands in order to control a cursor [1], 3 learning amounts to determining invariant spaces on which to project the data and learning classifiers in these spaces. This line of work has been further extended by Kang et al [17], [18], Lotte and Guan [19], and Devlaminck et al [20]. In these contributions, the authors demonstrate successful subject-to-subject transfer by regularizing spatial filters derived by CSP with data from other subjects, which amounts to attempting to find an invariant subspace on which to project the data of new subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is the requirement of future ubiquitous application of EEG instruments to capture the underlying consistency and inter-subject variations among EEG pa erns of di erent subjects. Kang et al [12] presented a Bayesian CSP model with Indian Bu et process (IBP) to investigate the shared latent subspace across subjects for EEG classi cation. eir experiments on two EEG datasets containing ve and nine subjects showed the superior performance of approximate 70% accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%