2014
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2014.993370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian approach to the inverse problem in a light scattering application

Abstract: Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For reasons of simplicity, the complete process of SEM microscopic imaging has not been simulated here. This work uses a simplified random sampling MC routine as described in [26] and is applied to a sample of a low number of particles, that is far below the several hundreds needed in order to make a reliable statistics per se [25].…”
Section: Physical Problem: Sem and Sls Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For reasons of simplicity, the complete process of SEM microscopic imaging has not been simulated here. This work uses a simplified random sampling MC routine as described in [26] and is applied to a sample of a low number of particles, that is far below the several hundreds needed in order to make a reliable statistics per se [25].…”
Section: Physical Problem: Sem and Sls Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, there are several methodologies within the framework of MSIF techniques, with the only requisite of expressing information in a statistical manner, through a probability density function (pdf). For example, several articles have successfully applied Bayesian approaches to the PSD retrieval such as [7,26]. Nevertheless, an effective employment of typical Bayesian methodologies such as Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) and Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods to realistic cases often implies a large computational cost, mostly because in such Monte Carlo algorithms is the need to numerically evaluate the posterior distribution, up to a normalisation constant, commonly many thousands or millions of times [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reasons of simplicity, the complete process of SEM microscopic imaging has not been simulated here. This work uses a simplified random sampling MC routine as described in a previous article [3] and is applied to a sample of a low number of particles, that is far below the several hundreds needed in order to make a reliable statistics per se [10].…”
Section: Physical Problem: Sem and Sls Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, there are several methodologies within the framework of MSIF techniques, with the only requisite of expressing information in a statistical manner, through a probability density function (pdf). For example, several articles have successfully applied Bayesian approaches to the PSD retrieval such as [2,3]. Nevertheless, an effective employment of typical Bayesian methodologies such as Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) and Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods to realistic cases often implies a large computational cost, mostly because in such Monte Carlo algorithms is the need to numerically evaluate the posterior distribution, up to a normalisation constant, commonly many thousands or millions of times [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements based on magnetic properties are introduced for the inversion of the magnetic diameter distribution. Commonly used methods include maximum likelihood estimation [19], Bayesian method [20], nonlinear method [21], and regularization method [22], however, noise in the data causes oscillations during parameter estimation. The temperature exerts a significant influence on the volume of the magnetic core, resulting in alterations to the magnetic diameter at both high and low temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%