2014
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis

Abstract: Single-cell data provides means to dissect the composition of complex tissues and specialized cellular environments. However, the analysis of such measurements is complicated by high levels of technical noise and intrinsic biological variability. We describe a probabilistic model of expression magnitude distortions typical of single-cell RNA sequencing measurements, which enables detection of differential expression signatures and identification of subpopulations of cells in a way that is more tolerant of nois… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,283
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,216 publications
(1,327 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
1,283
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of approaches are being considered for assuring confidence in these measurements, including the use of the External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) spike‐in material34, 35 to provide a metric of accuracy for those known sequences. Other approaches include the use of Bayesian statistics to assess real differences in the presence of dropout events36 that occur due to the low amount of RNA in cell samples and result in detection of the gene in some cells and not in others. When the apparent heterogeneity in gene expression is simply due to technical issues, the data can lead to erroneous conclusions of biological heterogeneity.…”
Section: Unique Challenges and Opportunities Posed By Single‐cell Anamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of approaches are being considered for assuring confidence in these measurements, including the use of the External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) spike‐in material34, 35 to provide a metric of accuracy for those known sequences. Other approaches include the use of Bayesian statistics to assess real differences in the presence of dropout events36 that occur due to the low amount of RNA in cell samples and result in detection of the gene in some cells and not in others. When the apparent heterogeneity in gene expression is simply due to technical issues, the data can lead to erroneous conclusions of biological heterogeneity.…”
Section: Unique Challenges and Opportunities Posed By Single‐cell Anamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplex protein expression (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, mRNA molecules in a cell can be randomly missed during the reverse transcription step and the following cDNA amplification step, and the mRNA products of some genes may be totally missed in the capturing procedure, which then produces dropout zeros in the scRNA-seq data (3,25,26). In this section, we try to model this mRNA capture procedure and study what impact this process will have on the ZINB distribution.…”
Section: Model the Mrna Capture Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is called dropout events (25,26). We call this type of zero values as dropout zeros.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation