2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian approach for counting experiment statistics applied to a neutrino point source analysis

Abstract: In this paper we present a model independent analysis method following Bayesian statistics to analyse data from a generic counting experiment and apply it to the search for neutrinos from point sources. We discuss a test statistic defined following a Bayesian framework that will be used in the search for a signal. In case no signal is found, we derive an upper limit without the introduction of approximations. The Bayesian approach allows us to obtain the full probability density function for both the backgroun… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case that no significant signal is observed, an upper limit is determined. This method is described in [30] where it was applied to public IceCube data for 10 nearby Blazars, for which a flux upper limit was obtained. [29].…”
Section: Neutrino Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that no significant signal is observed, an upper limit is determined. This method is described in [30] where it was applied to public IceCube data for 10 nearby Blazars, for which a flux upper limit was obtained. [29].…”
Section: Neutrino Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these GRB-neutrino rate estimates, the extended searches required for detection will also have a significant contribution from atmospheric background neutrinos. Therefore, it can be critical to use all available information about the emission process to better identify astrophysical neutrinos by improving the signal to noise ratio (see, e.g., [14,15] for improved stacking methods).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%