2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian analysis of stochastic volatility models with fat-tails and correlated errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
364
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 509 publications
(376 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
364
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the leverage effect is not warranted, and hence it is difficult to interpret the leverage effect (Yu, 2005). Danielsson (1998) and Chan et al (2005) considered a multivariate extension of the model of Jacquier et al (2004). The model is given by Equations (3) and (4), together with…”
Section: Leverage Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the leverage effect is not warranted, and hence it is difficult to interpret the leverage effect (Yu, 2005). Danielsson (1998) and Chan et al (2005) considered a multivariate extension of the model of Jacquier et al (2004). The model is given by Equations (3) and (4), together with…”
Section: Leverage Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently SV models with contemporaneous correlation (ρ) between t and η t has been discussed by, e.g. (Jacquier, Polson & Rossi 2004) among others. SV model with the feedback effect ρ relates the changes in volatility to the sign and magnitude of price changes which helps in pricing the options more accurately.…”
Section: Dynamic Feedback Sv Model With Common Market Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further comparisons were made with two SV models with Student-t innovations one without (SV(1)-t), and one with 'leverage effect' (SV(1)-t leverage), using the algorithms of Jacquier et al (1994Jacquier et al ( , 2004. Finally, we compared our IUM model with a DPM model with the same GARCH-type representations for the volatility, the SV-DPM model of Jensen and Maheu (2010), and the πDDP model of Griffin and Steel (2006).…”
Section: Empirical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%