2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2778533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayes-Nash Equilibria in Generalized Second Price Auctions with Allocative Externalities

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate an incomplete information model of generalized second price auctions with allocative externalities originating from the heterogeneous match rates of bidders. A novel feature of our model is that it generates endogenous click-through rates (CTRs). In this setting, we establish existence of symmetric efficient equilibria for common classes of primitives. This contrasts with the findings of Gomes and Sweeney (2014), who study a similar model but with fixed CTRs. Moreover, nonexistenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they provide conditions under which this equilibrium exists. Lu and Riis [50] complement the analysis of Gomes and Sweeney [6] by considering allocative externalities arising from the heterogeneous match rates of bidders, obtaining similar results concerning the existence of a Bayesian Nash equilibrium. In addition, applications of the GSP to other fields different than sponsored keywords markets can be found in the literature, see for example, Reference [7] or Reference [51].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, they provide conditions under which this equilibrium exists. Lu and Riis [50] complement the analysis of Gomes and Sweeney [6] by considering allocative externalities arising from the heterogeneous match rates of bidders, obtaining similar results concerning the existence of a Bayesian Nash equilibrium. In addition, applications of the GSP to other fields different than sponsored keywords markets can be found in the literature, see for example, Reference [7] or Reference [51].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 84%