If Memory Serves 2011
DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816676101.003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Battles over the Gay past

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, this did not lay the groundwork for the development of a Dutch queer politics (Duyvendak, 1996), in contrast to the US context (Castiglia and Reed, 2011).…”
Section: Visibility and Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, this did not lay the groundwork for the development of a Dutch queer politics (Duyvendak, 1996), in contrast to the US context (Castiglia and Reed, 2011).…”
Section: Visibility and Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This meaning was also projected onto the Homomonument . At that time, according to Binnie (1995: 175), this monument also came ‘to represent a site of memory and mourning for those we have lost to AIDS’ – see HIV/AIDS activism in Castiglia and Reed (2011) and Stockdill (2003) . Learning from what happened in NYC, where many locals initially did not welcome the Gay Liberation Monument , the Homomonument ’s founders contended that this should become a ‘living monument’ – not some ‘misery on a pedestal’ (Koenders, 1987: 29).…”
Section: Homomonument In Historical and Geographical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chris Castiglia and Chris Reed (2012) echo Hilderbrand in their desire to underscore “the joyous, collective, idealistic, and socially situated possibilities of sexual liberation” (p. 5) that more conventional understandings of the AIDS crisis tend to leave aside. Castiglia and Reed (2012) criticize the prevalence of historical narratives that frame AIDS in a way that either perpetuates moralistic ideas about sexual propriety or creates linear, reductive ideas about “progress” won by LGBTQ+ rights movements. At the same time, they worry about a vanguardism that orients queer thought toward future change so completely that scholars and activists cannot appreciate the imaginative, fruitful ways of being in the world that characterized LGBTQ+ life in the past.…”
Section: Remembering Aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%