2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10131593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Battery Durability and Reliability under Electric Utility Grid Operations: Analysis of On-Site Reference Tests

Abstract: Grid-tied energy storage will play a key role in the reduction of carbon emissions. Systems based on Li-ion batteries could be good candidates for the task, especially those using lithium titanate negative electrodes. In this work, we will present the study of seven years of usage of a lithium titanate-based battery energy storage system on an isolated island grid. We will show that, even after seven years, the modules’ capacity loss is below 10% and that overall the battery is still performing within specific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the current was not constant, capacity and time were uncorrelated, which offered an opportunity to study two different datasets, V vs. Q and V vs. t . While using voltage versus capacity is standard, it might not be the best solution for deployed systems because the V vs. t dataset should be less error-prone than the V vs. Q one, as capacity is not directly measurable but derived from time and current 46 . The V vs. Q dataset is, however, expected to be easier to diagnose because the area under a d Q /d V peak corresponds to capacity, and, at low rates, it is independent of the applied current because it has a finite value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the current was not constant, capacity and time were uncorrelated, which offered an opportunity to study two different datasets, V vs. Q and V vs. t . While using voltage versus capacity is standard, it might not be the best solution for deployed systems because the V vs. t dataset should be less error-prone than the V vs. Q one, as capacity is not directly measurable but derived from time and current 46 . The V vs. Q dataset is, however, expected to be easier to diagnose because the area under a d Q /d V peak corresponds to capacity, and, at low rates, it is independent of the applied current because it has a finite value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because current was not constant, capacity and time were uncorrelated, which offered an opportunity to study two different datasets, V vs. Q and V vs. t.. While using voltage versus capacity is more traditional, it might not be the best solution for deployed systems because the V vs. t dataset should be less error-prone than the V vs. Q one as capacity is not directly measurable, but derived from time and current [39]. The V vs. Q dataset is however expected to be easier to diagnose because the area under a dQ/dV peak corresponds to capacity and, at low rates, it is independent of the applied current because it has a nite value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%