2021
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2020.3040186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bathymetric Retrieval Selectively Using Multiangular High-Spatial-Resolution Satellite Imagery

Abstract: This paper introduces multi-angular imagery into physics-based bathymetry in order to compensate for the shortage of bathymetric spectral bands caused by the low spectral resolution of current high-spatial-resolution satellite multispectral imagery. The focus is to propose a selective bathymetric retrieval method to eliminate the negative effect of non-optimal image data on depth retrieval in multi-angular imagery-based bathymetry. The elimination of the negative effect is implemented by excluding non-optimal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the linear method, the band ratio method reduces the parameters that need to be adjusted, and at the same time exhibits stronger stability. Liu et al [32] proposed an adaptive blended algorithm approach to improved the method proposed by Stumpf, which significantly improved the accuracy of the estimate of water depth; Cao et al [33] used the band ratio method to estimate the depth of the St. Croix area; Forfinski-Sarkozi et al [34] used the Stumpf's method to fuse singlephoton data with Landsat-8 data to draw the Keweenaw Bay nearshore water depth map; Ma et al [24] used the above two classic methods to fuse single-photon data as in-situ data with Sentinel-2 images and the map of water depth map was drawn on the shallow water area of Acklins Island.…”
Section: A Classical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the linear method, the band ratio method reduces the parameters that need to be adjusted, and at the same time exhibits stronger stability. Liu et al [32] proposed an adaptive blended algorithm approach to improved the method proposed by Stumpf, which significantly improved the accuracy of the estimate of water depth; Cao et al [33] used the band ratio method to estimate the depth of the St. Croix area; Forfinski-Sarkozi et al [34] used the Stumpf's method to fuse singlephoton data with Landsat-8 data to draw the Keweenaw Bay nearshore water depth map; Ma et al [24] used the above two classic methods to fuse single-photon data as in-situ data with Sentinel-2 images and the map of water depth map was drawn on the shallow water area of Acklins Island.…”
Section: A Classical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works use depth information collected from acoustic systems [11]- [13], [15], [16], [20]- [23], [31]- [35], airborne LiDAR systems [10], [11], [14], [17], [19], [26], [28], [36]- [38] or LiDAR data obtained from Ice, Cloud, and Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) satellites [18], [29], [30], as ground truth data. The study areas of interest in most of the above works belong to coastal regions [10]- [12], [14], [15], [17]- [19], [21], [28], [32], [34], [37], [39] and only a small number of works study SDB for inland water bodies [13], [16], [38]. As mentioned, most of the above works consider the reflectance values collected by satellites as input for estimating depth of water columns.…”
Section: A Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing works, the trained models are evaluated on the same region in [11], [13], [21], [23], [30], [32]- [34], [37], [38] and different nearby regions in [10], [12], [14]- [19], [26], [28], [29], [35], [36]. We evaluate the proposed models in the same region, as in multiple works above.…”
Section: A Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%