1988
DOI: 10.2307/3514446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bathymetric co-ordination of proximality trends and level-bottom communities; a case study from the Lower Silurian of Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), the gap is substantial and the area was first flooded in the late Rhuddanian (Coronograptus cyphus graptolite Biozone, see Electronic Supplement). This is in agreement with what Baarli (1988) found for the base of the Solvik Formation at Toverud in Sylling, approximately 4 km north of Olledalen. Topographically, this appears to have been a well exposed high that (Brenchley & Marshall, 1999).…”
Section: Relative Sea-level Changessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…1), the gap is substantial and the area was first flooded in the late Rhuddanian (Coronograptus cyphus graptolite Biozone, see Electronic Supplement). This is in agreement with what Baarli (1988) found for the base of the Solvik Formation at Toverud in Sylling, approximately 4 km north of Olledalen. Topographically, this appears to have been a well exposed high that (Brenchley & Marshall, 1999).…”
Section: Relative Sea-level Changessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…When describing and interpreting relative sealevel changes or eustasy, brachiopod assemblages have been used (e.g., Brett et al 1993). These have also been used to solve the relation between bathymetry and proximality trends (Baarli 1988). The upward decrease of depositional depth over the investigated interval can also be deduced from the fauna: the Pentamerusbearing micritic limestones somewhat below the base of the Fröjel Fm.…”
Section: Proximality Trends and Depthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shallower portions of the Rochester Shale were deposited in a muddy outer shelf, in perhaps 20±50 m of water, below normal wave base but strongly in¯uenced by episodic storms. The interbedded limestones within the Rochester Shale appear to be tempestites or storm deposits (Cant 1980;Aigner 1982Aigner , 1985DeCelles 1987;Baarli 1988;Duke 1990). Winnowed bryozoan-rich coquinites were generated as proximal deposits by the aggradation and winnowing of skeletal material in areas affected directly by storm waves.…”
Section: O V E R V I E W O F S T R a T I G R A P H Ymentioning
confidence: 99%