2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bateman's principle is reversed in a cooperatively breeding bird

Abstract: Bateman's principle is not only used to explain sex differences in mating behaviour, but also to determine which sex has the greater opportunity for sexual selection. It predicts that the relationship between the number of mates and the number of offspring produced should be stronger for males than for females. Yet, it is unclear whether Bateman's principle holds in cooperatively breeding systems where the strength of selection on traits used in intrasexual competition is high in both sexes. We tested Bateman'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection on traits used for access to mates, resources or social rank may be similarly strong in both sexes in social vertebrates and insects with totipotent workers because intrasexual competition is similarly strong in females and males [9,11,12]. Here, we show that patterns of sexual dimorphism in secondary sexual characteristics do not just differ between social and non-social species (sensu [11]), but instead vary Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selection on traits used for access to mates, resources or social rank may be similarly strong in both sexes in social vertebrates and insects with totipotent workers because intrasexual competition is similarly strong in females and males [9,11,12]. Here, we show that patterns of sexual dimorphism in secondary sexual characteristics do not just differ between social and non-social species (sensu [11]), but instead vary Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In such systems, both males and females may experience strong intrasexual competition for mates or breeding opportunities, and thus females may have equally high (or even higher) variance in reproductive success than males [8][9][10][11]. Ultimately, selection on the same competitive traits used in intrasexual competition for access to mates, resources or social rank can be as strong in females as in males of these social species [9,11,12]. For example, cooperatively breeding birds are generally not sexually dimorphic [13], and sexual dimorphism in plumage and body size is reduced in cooperative African starlings (Sturnidae) compared with their non-cooperative relatives [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising, since most nest failure in superb starlings is the result of predation [19], not the lack of parental care. The most important predictor of high lifetime reproductive success in superb starlings is the number of times a female breeds [20], so simply being able to breed more often because kin are present may be vital to female fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used this measurement rather than lifetime reproductive success (i.e., total number of offspring fledged) because high nest predation rates and unpredictable breeding conditions in this population make this an unreliable indicator of the number of breeding opportunities an individual obtained. Moreover, we know from previous work in this system that the number of seasons breeding is the strongest predictor of lifetime reproductive success (Apakupakul and Rubenstein, 2015). Thus, our selected predictor variables (i.e., age, current status, proportion of seasons breeding) are all believed to be correlated with fitness and dominance status in superb starlings.…”
Section: Song Diversity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%