1990
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199002000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bateman Bipolar Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calder et al [18] in his study concluded that there is no justification for the use of the expensive bipolar hip prosthesis in femoral neck fracture. On the other hand, La Belle et al [19] reported that bipolar prosthesis resulted in less pain and decreased protrusio in comparison with the conventional fixed-head prosthesis. Lestrange [20] reviewed 496 patients with bipolar replacements for displaced femoral neck fractures and compared them with patients having fixed-head prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calder et al [18] in his study concluded that there is no justification for the use of the expensive bipolar hip prosthesis in femoral neck fracture. On the other hand, La Belle et al [19] reported that bipolar prosthesis resulted in less pain and decreased protrusio in comparison with the conventional fixed-head prosthesis. Lestrange [20] reviewed 496 patients with bipolar replacements for displaced femoral neck fractures and compared them with patients having fixed-head prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LaBelle [19] in his Qasim. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science study of bipolar hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures reported incidence of 0.8% dislocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When patients could not be evaluated in person, a questionnaire was used and patients were asked to send radiographs. Acetabular protrusio and cartilage erosion were evaluated as described by LaBelle et al [15]. In brief, acetabular cartilage erosion was assessed by measuring the change of thickness of the acetabular cartilage compared with the postoperative radiograph [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acetabular protrusio and cartilage erosion were evaluated as described by LaBelle et al [15]. In brief, acetabular cartilage erosion was assessed by measuring the change of thickness of the acetabular cartilage compared with the postoperative radiograph [15]. Femoral component loosening was assessed on radiographs by measuring radiolucencies at the cement-bone or prosthesis-cement interface following the methods of Gruen et al [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] A wide variety of cemented and cementless versions of hemiarthroplasty are being used worldwide with debate about advantages between the two still going on. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] With cardiopulmonary complications, due to cementing and difficulty in revision cementless prosthesis are being increasingly used.prosthesis to hold in cementless prosthesis and increases the incidence of complications like periprosthetic fractures. 17,18 However modern hydroxyapatite coated stems have made use of cementless hemiarthroplasty possible even in weaker osteoporotic bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%