1996
DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(96)00109-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Batch process monitoring for consistent production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two test statistics are derived from this model and both are monitored using control charts. Since its introduction, batch process monitoring has been successfully applied to many different processes and extensions have been suggested ( Martin et al. , 1996; Rannar , 1998; Wold et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two test statistics are derived from this model and both are monitored using control charts. Since its introduction, batch process monitoring has been successfully applied to many different processes and extensions have been suggested ( Martin et al. , 1996; Rannar , 1998; Wold et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PCA monitoring, the confidence limit is approximated by a specified distribution based upon the assumption that the latent variables follow a Gaussian distribution. However, the monitoring charts indicate many false alarms since this assumption is not valid in some cases (Martin et al, 1996). On the other hand, the independent components over some period do not conform to a multivariate Gaussian distribution; hence, the confidence limits of the I 2 , I e 2 and SPE statistics cannot be determined directly from a particular approximate distribution.…”
Section: Process Monitoring Statistics Of Icamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Neogi and Schlags580 applied multivariate statistical methods (multiway PCA and multiway PLS) to an industrial emulsion polymerization batch process. Martin et al581 reviewed the M 2 statistic (an alternative to the Hotelling T 2 statistic) and applied it to a batch MMA polymerization process. Other studies that have used multivariate statistical approaches were presented by Rannar et al,582 who used a multiblock PCA and PLS algorithm; Flores‐Cerrillo and MacGregor,583–586 who proposed multivariate approaches to predict particle size in emulsion polymerization reactors; Kumar et al587 for high‐pressure polymerization reactors; Albazzaz and Wang588 in the semi‐batch polymerization of polyol; Chen and Liu,589 who used dynamic PCA and PLS models; Duchesne et al590 who used PCA and PLS for the analysis and monitoring of process transitions (process start‐ups and restarts), and Sharmin et al544 who used PLS to develop a soft sensor to predict MFI.…”
Section: Other Topics Related To Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%