2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Batch and column adsorption and desorption of fluoride using hydrous ferric oxide: Solution chemistry and modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The resins GMDA, NDA-88 and D-301 with amine groups exhibit the positive charge with protonation appearance in the acid environment while the XAD-4 presents corresponding isoelectric points due to the nonfunctional group structure. So, large amounts of free-state sulfonic acid groups make the charge of H-acid below the isoelectric point, which causes a strong charge interaction with the resins of amine group [24]. According to the Zeta potential-pH profiles, the best adsorption performances might occur within the pH 2-4 due to the electrostatic interaction.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resins GMDA, NDA-88 and D-301 with amine groups exhibit the positive charge with protonation appearance in the acid environment while the XAD-4 presents corresponding isoelectric points due to the nonfunctional group structure. So, large amounts of free-state sulfonic acid groups make the charge of H-acid below the isoelectric point, which causes a strong charge interaction with the resins of amine group [24]. According to the Zeta potential-pH profiles, the best adsorption performances might occur within the pH 2-4 due to the electrostatic interaction.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 8 cycles, the adsorbents were withdrawn from the column, washed, air dried and weighed to find out its loss. It was noticed that there was no significant loss of all the three adsorbents [9].…”
Section: Column Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers are mostly focusing their study on various types of inexpensive and effective materials such as different clays, coconut shell carbon, chemically activated carbon, bone charcoal, natural zeolites, burnt clay, activated alumina (Ayoob et al 2008), red mud (Tor et al 2009) alum sludge (Sujana et al 1998), chitosan beads (Viswanathan and Meenakshi 2008), carbonaceous materials (Márquez-Mendoza et al 2012;Ikuo et al 2004), calcite (Yang et al 1999), montmorillonite (Tor 2006), Citrus limonum (lemon) leaf (Tomar et al 2014), Zr-Mn composite material (Tomar et al 2013), kanuma mud (Chen et al 2011), acid-treated bentonite (Ma et al 2011), polypyrrole/Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanocomposite (Bhaumik et al 2011), bayerite/boehmite nanocomposites (Jia et al 2015), Fe-Mg-La triple-metal composite , hydrous ferric oxide (Nur et al 2014), hydroxyapatite (Jiménez-Reyes and Solache-Ríos 2013), ZnCr-layered double hydroxides and their polymeric composites (Koilraj and Kannan 2013), Ce(IV)-Zr(IV) mixed oxide nanoparticles (Ghosh et al 2015), spent bleaching earth (Mahramanlioglu et al 2002), and other low-cost adsorbents with various degrees of success (Ali 2006;Yadav et al 2006). So, there is a crucial need to explore locally available inexpensive defluoridation materials for safe and easy use at both household and small community levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%