2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches

Abstract: External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After accounting for body size and phylogenetic relatedness, neither traditional morphometrics nor geometric morphometrics are capable of significantly separating birds into a priori ecological categories. However, ordination analyses do demonstrate some separation of claw groups in morphospace when using geometric morphometrics, suggesting that geometric morphometrics leads to increased ecological classification in comparison with traditional morphometric methods in claws, as it does for a wide range of structures in many different groups (e.g., Hedrick & Dumont, ; Schmieder, Benítez, Borissov, & Fruciano, ; Tinius & Russell, ). We find support for the assertion that claw shape varies along a spectrum and the relationship between ecological patterns and claw shape is complex (Tinius & Russell, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After accounting for body size and phylogenetic relatedness, neither traditional morphometrics nor geometric morphometrics are capable of significantly separating birds into a priori ecological categories. However, ordination analyses do demonstrate some separation of claw groups in morphospace when using geometric morphometrics, suggesting that geometric morphometrics leads to increased ecological classification in comparison with traditional morphometric methods in claws, as it does for a wide range of structures in many different groups (e.g., Hedrick & Dumont, ; Schmieder, Benítez, Borissov, & Fruciano, ; Tinius & Russell, ). We find support for the assertion that claw shape varies along a spectrum and the relationship between ecological patterns and claw shape is complex (Tinius & Russell, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Schmieder et al. ), as the ordinations do not exaggerate the extent of separation between groups, one of the typical drawbacks of the commonly used scatterplots of canonical variate scores (Mitteroecker and Bookstein ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Schmieder et al. ) based on population means was used as an exploratory tool to visualize the degree of overlap among populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%