2021
DOI: 10.1111/btp.13007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bat–flower interaction networks in Caatinga reveal generalized associations and temporal stability

Abstract: Seasonal variation in precipitation regimes influences species composition and plantanimal interactions. Such temporal variation is especially relevant in the Brazilian Caatinga, the largest Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest in South America, where bat pollination is unusually frequent in comparison with other tropical plant communities.Here, we describe seasonal and annual variations of the interaction networks between nectarivorous bats and flower species in the Caatinga. Five species of nectar-feeding bats int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be especially relevant as provision of pollination service by nocturnal pollinators can be unpredictable (e.g., moth pollination, Oliveira et al, 2004), and by also attracting diurnal pollinators, nocturnal plants may increase visitation and pollination opportunities (Potascheff et al, 2020). Interestingly, an opposite occurrence of diurnal opening flowers interacting with nocturnal pollinators was not recorded in our study, although such occurrences are known in other communities (e.g., Cordero‐Schmidt et al, 2021; Diniz et al, 2022). Hence, our findings could further highlight a strategy of nocturnal plants to often make use of diurnal pollinators to increase reproduction chances (Miyake & Yahara, 1998).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be especially relevant as provision of pollination service by nocturnal pollinators can be unpredictable (e.g., moth pollination, Oliveira et al, 2004), and by also attracting diurnal pollinators, nocturnal plants may increase visitation and pollination opportunities (Potascheff et al, 2020). Interestingly, an opposite occurrence of diurnal opening flowers interacting with nocturnal pollinators was not recorded in our study, although such occurrences are known in other communities (e.g., Cordero‐Schmidt et al, 2021; Diniz et al, 2022). Hence, our findings could further highlight a strategy of nocturnal plants to often make use of diurnal pollinators to increase reproduction chances (Miyake & Yahara, 1998).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…In this way, floral longevity plays an important role in the reproductive ecology of plants influencing the number of pollinator visits (Ferreira et al, 2018; Primack, 1985). Hence, there are also known instances of diurnal opening flowers with extended flower longevity that interact with nocturnal pollinators (Cordero‐Schmidt et al, 2021; Diniz et al, 2022; Gomes et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiropterophilous flowers have less restrictive morphologies compared to other pollination systems (Fleming et al, 2005; Queiroz et al, 2021). Thus, bat flowers can be visited by obligatory and opportunistic nectar‐feeding bat species in a community (Cordero‐Schmidt et al, 2021; Gonzalez‐Terrazas et al, 2012). Hence, plant and bat morphological traits appear to be less important in shaping niche overlap in bat–plant interactions than the phylogenetic distance among species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On plant communities in the Cerrado, ornithophily and quiropterophilly represent less than 5% of all angiosperm species (Rabeling et al 2019). These syndromes are strongly related to specific taxa, especially bromeliads (Rocca and Sazima 2010) and cactuses (Cordero-Schmidt et al 2021), respectively. In the present study, ornithophily was observed in plant species with red or yellow tubular diurnal flowers with large amounts of nectar, on Palicourea rigida (Gentianales, Rubiaceae) (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%